ORtg
77.0
34th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · THA · b. 2009
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
5.0 RPGRebounding · 77th event percentile
1.3 stocksDefensive activity · 68th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #139 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
26.2
Event performance
26th event percentile
PI
32.5
Prospect index
26th event percentile
ORtg
77.0
Points / 100 poss.
34th event percentile
DRtg
113.8
Lower is better
18th event percentile
NRtg
-36.8
Two-way margin
28th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 77.0 · 34th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 113.8 · Stop% 62.4% · Team DRtg 121.7
Sample context
3 games · 43 minutes · 42% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
26.2
26th event percentile
Prospect index
32.5
26th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
77.0
34th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
113.8
18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-36.8
28th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.4%
82nd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
3.7 PPG
32nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
21st event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.3% TS
48th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 26th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.0 ORtg and 113.8 DRtg, producing a -36.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin.
Defensive stops
62.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
1.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive efficiency
113.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Two-way margin
-36.8 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
77.0
34th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
3.7 PPG
32nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.3%
48th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.5%
58th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
45.5%
73rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
29th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.5%
44th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
21st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
113.8
18th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
121.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+7.9
94th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.4%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
68th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
11.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-36.8
28th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-20.0
26th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
26.2
26th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
32.5
26th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.8%
39th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
43.0
context14.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
41.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#139
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
3.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.3
APG
#139
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
3.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.3
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.7
P32
Playmaking
0.3
P21
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
46%
P48
Two-way impact
-36.8
P28
Stops
62%
P82
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
5 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
3.7 / game
5–11
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
4
TOV
1.3 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
6
OREB
9
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
26.2
HESI
32.5
PI
77.0
ORtg
113.8
DRtg
-36.8
NRtg
-20.0
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
3%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+7.9
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#139
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
3.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.3
APG
1.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
46%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #139
//quick_read
3.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.3
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.7
P32
Playmaking
0.3
P21
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
46%
P48
Two-way impact
-36.8
P28
Stops
62%
P82
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
5 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
3.7 / game
5–11
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
4
TOV
1.3 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
6
OREB
9
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
26.2
HESI
32.5
PI
77.0
ORtg
113.8
DRtg
-36.8
NRtg
-20.0
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
3%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+7.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.