ORtg
120.8
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Xuan Hao
Forward · CHN · b. 2008
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Efficiency74% TS on 9.8 PPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact87.7 HESI performance · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDefensive Impact86.7 DRtg · 63% Stop% · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+34.2 Net Rating · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
74.0% TSScoring efficiency · 97th event percentile
9.8 PPGScoring load · 75th event percentile
- 87.7
- HESI v2.1
- #24
- of 188
- 61%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #24 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
87.7
Event performance
88th event percentile
PI
81.7
Prospect index
88th event percentile
ORtg
120.8
Points / 100 poss.
84th event percentile
DRtg
86.7
Lower is better
88th event percentile
NRtg
+34.2
Two-way margin
88th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 120.8 · 84th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.7 · Stop% 63.0% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 92 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
74.0% TS97th event percentile
Scoring load
9.8 PPG75th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
87.7
88th event percentile
Prospect index
81.7
88th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
120.8
84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.7
88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+34.2
88th event percentile
Stop percentage
63.0%
84th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
75th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
67th event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
48th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
74.0% TS
97th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Event Efficiency
74% TS on 9.8 PPG · 97th event percentile
- P88
Event Impact
87.7 HESI performance · 88th event percentile
- P86
Defensive Impact
86.7 DRtg · 63% Stop% · 86th event percentile
- P86
Two-Way Impact
+34.2 Net Rating · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 88th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 120.8 ORtg and 86.7 DRtg, producing a +34.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
74.0% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+34.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 88th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.8 PPG
75th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
74.0%
97th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
71.4%
96th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
65.7%
96th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
66.7%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
81.8%
78th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.3%
85th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
67th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.7
88th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.2
76th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.0%
84th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
48th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+34.2
88th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.6
88th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
87.7
88th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
81.7
88th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.7%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
92.3
context15.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#24
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.7
APG
#24
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#24/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.7
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
74%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P75
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
74%
P97
Two-way impact
+34.2
P88
Stops
63%
P84
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
66%
23 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
82%
9 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
23–35
FGM–FGA
4–6
3PM–3PA
9–11
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.91×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
20
REB
3.3 / game
6
OREB
14
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
87.7
HESI
81.7
PI
120.8
ORtg
86.7
DRtg
+34.2
NRtg
+17.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
71%
eFG%
7%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+2.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #23John AryangF · AUSrank_below · #25SOHEYL SOLEYMAN NEZHADSF · IRI
//current_rank
#24
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#22
Center · CHN
5.3 PPG 7.3 RPG 0.3 APG
//event_signalRim Protection2.3 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.3 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#23
#25
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.7
APG
1.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
67%
3P%
74%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #24
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.7
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
74%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P75
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
74%
P97
Two-way impact
+34.2
P88
Stops
63%
P84
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
66%
23 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
82%
9 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
23–35
FGM–FGA
4–6
3PM–3PA
9–11
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.91×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
20
REB
3.3 / game
6
OREB
14
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
87.7
HESI
81.7
PI
120.8
ORtg
86.7
DRtg
+34.2
NRtg
+17.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
71%
eFG%
7%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+2.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.