ORtg
63.8
22nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Sihath Kalatuwage
Power Forward · SRI, AUS · b. 2008
//measurables
193 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
5.0 RPGRebounding · 77th event percentile
1.7 stocksDefensive activity · 69th event percentile
- 4.8
- HESI v2.1
- #179
- of 188
- 51%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #179 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
4.8
Event performance
5th event percentile
PI
15.3
Prospect index
5th event percentile
ORtg
63.8
Points / 100 poss.
22nd event percentile
DRtg
120.0
Lower is better
10th event percentile
NRtg
-56.2
Two-way margin
18th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 63.8 · 22nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 120.0 · Stop% 48.7% · Team DRtg 122.0
Sample context
3 games · 62 minutes · 51% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
5.0 RPG77th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks69th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
4.8
5th event percentile
Prospect index
15.3
5th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
63.8
22nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
120.0
10th event percentile
Two-way margin
-56.2
18th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.7%
45th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
62nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
69th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.9% TS
47th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P88
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 5th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 63.8 ORtg and 120.0 DRtg, producing a -56.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 77th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 69th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 10th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
120.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-56.2 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 22nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
63.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.7 PPG
62nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.9%
47th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.9%
42nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.4%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
71.4%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.5%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
120.0
10th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
122.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.1
75th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.7%
45th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
69th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-56.2
18th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-32.4
5th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
4.8
5th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
15.3
5th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.5%
39th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
61.7
context20.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
50.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#179
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#179
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#179/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.7
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
46%
P47
Two-way impact
-56.2
P18
Stops
49%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
8 made / 22 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
7.7 / game
8–22
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.0 / game
13
TOV
4.3 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
5
OREB
10
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
4.8
HESI
15.3
PI
63.8
ORtg
120.0
DRtg
-56.2
NRtg
-32.4
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
2%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+2.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #178Charan SirisuntornPF · THArank_below · #180Adil SultanovPG · KAZ
//current_rank
#179
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#177
#178
#180
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.7
SPG
1.0
BPG
29%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #179
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.7
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
46%
P47
Two-way impact
-56.2
P18
Stops
49%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
8 made / 22 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
7.7 / game
8–22
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.0 / game
13
TOV
4.3 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
5
OREB
10
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
4.8
HESI
15.3
PI
63.8
ORtg
120.0
DRtg
-56.2
NRtg
-32.4
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
2%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+2.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.