ORtg
78.7
36th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Alexander Junior David
Forward · THA · b. 2009
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
11.0 PPGScoring load · 83rd event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 81st event percentile
- 9.1
- HESI v2.1
- #171
- of 188
- 59%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #171 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
9.1
Event performance
9th event percentile
PI
18.8
Prospect index
9th event percentile
ORtg
78.7
Points / 100 poss.
36th event percentile
DRtg
120.1
Lower is better
10th event percentile
NRtg
-41.4
Two-way margin
25th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 78.7 · 36th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 120.1 · Stop% 48.1% · Team DRtg 121.7
Sample context
3 games · 88 minutes · 59% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
11.0 PPG83rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks81st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
9.1
9th event percentile
Prospect index
18.8
9th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
78.7
36th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
120.1
10th event percentile
Two-way margin
-41.4
25th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.1%
42nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
56th event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.1% TS
44th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 9th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 78.7 ORtg and 120.1 DRtg, producing a -41.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 10th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
120.1 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 25th event percentile
Two-way margin
-41.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 36th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
78.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.1%
44th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.5%
58th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.4%
52nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
23.5%
context5.7 attempts per game
Free throws
30.0%
11th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.1%
37th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
56th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
120.1
10th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
121.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.6
73rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.1%
42nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
81st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
17.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-41.4
25th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-27.8
9th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
9.1
9th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
18.8
9th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
87.6
context29.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
59.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#171
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
11.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.3
APG
#171
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#171/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
1.3
P56
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
44%
P44
Two-way impact
-41.4
P25
Stops
48%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
13 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
4 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
11.0 / game
13–33
FGM–FGA
4–17
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.3 / game
7
TOV
2.3 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
10
REB
3.3 / game
2
OREB
8
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
7
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9.1
HESI
18.8
PI
78.7
ORtg
120.1
DRtg
-41.4
NRtg
-27.8
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+1.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #170Thanawat PisarnyuttanapongC · THArank_below · #172Song-Lin YangF · TPE
//current_rank
#171
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#169
#170
#172
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
11.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.3
APG
2.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
24%
3P%
44%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #171
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
1.3
P56
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
44%
P44
Two-way impact
-41.4
P25
Stops
48%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
13 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
4 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
11.0 / game
13–33
FGM–FGA
4–17
3PM–3PA
3–10
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.3 / game
7
TOV
2.3 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
10
REB
3.3 / game
2
OREB
8
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
7
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9.1
HESI
18.8
PI
78.7
ORtg
120.1
DRtg
-41.4
NRtg
-27.8
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+1.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.