back_to_rankings
You-Cheng Jhou portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

You-Cheng Jhou

Forward · TPE · b. 2008

//measurables

190 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator4.3 APG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

4.3 APGCreation · 92nd event percentile

51.4% TSScoring efficiency · 65th event percentile

12.3
HESI v2.1
#165
of 188
70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #165 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

12.3

Event performance

13th event percentile

PI

21.3

Prospect index

13th event percentile

ORtg

81.7

Points / 100 poss.

38th event percentile

DRtg

113.5

Lower is better

20th event percentile

NRtg

-31.9

Two-way margin

33rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 81.7 · 38th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 113.5 · Stop% 31.0% · Team DRtg 105.2

Sample context

7 games · 140 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.3 APG92nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

51.4% TS65th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

12.3

13th event percentile

Prospect index

21.3

13th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

81.7

38th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

113.5

20th event percentile

Two-way margin

-31.9

33rd event percentile

Stop percentage

31.0%

8th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.9 PPG

49th event percentile

Creation

4.3 APG

92nd event percentile

Rebounding

1.0 RPG

20th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

51.4% TS

65th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P92

    Creator

    4.3 APG · 92nd event percentile

  • Shooter

    38% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 13th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 81.7 ORtg and 113.5 DRtg, producing a -31.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.3 APG

    92nd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    31.0% Stop%

    8th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  2. Rebounding

    1.0 RPG

    20th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    113.5 DRtg

    20th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

81.7

38th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.9 PPG

49th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

51.4%

65th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

51.3%

72nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

43.6%

67th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

37.5%

context

2.3 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

29th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

35.4%

34th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.3 APG

92nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

113.5

20th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

105.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-8.3

9th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

31.0%

8th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

31st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

19.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-31.9

33rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-24.7

13th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

12.3

13th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

21.3

13th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.6%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.0 RPG

20th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

140.2

context

20.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

70.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#165

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

617.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

7

GP

5.9

PPG

1.0

RPG

4.3

APG

#165

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#165/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.9

PPG

1.0

RPG

4.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.9

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.9

P49

Playmaking

4.3

P92

Rebounding

1.0

P20

True shooting

51%

P65

Two-way impact

-31.9

P33

Stops

31%

P8

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

17 made / 39 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

6 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

2PA 233PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

41

PTS

5.9 / game

17–39

FGM–FGA

6–16

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

30

AST

4.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

1.30×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

7

REB

1.0 / game

1

OREB

6

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

12.3

HESI

21.3

PI

81.7

ORtg

113.5

DRtg

-31.9

NRtg

-24.7

Stable NRtg

31%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

51%

eFG%

3%

PIE

105.2

Team DRtg

-8.3

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games140 minutes20.0 min/game70% sample weightrank #165 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • ALI AYMAN A. HAMZA portrait#163

    ALI AYMAN A. HAMZA

    Point Guard · BRN

    0.0 PPG 1.5 RPG 0.5 APG

  • Yubeom SHIN portrait#164

    Yubeom SHIN

    Forward · KOR

    0.3 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Aiyakan Komsri portrait#166

    Aiyakan Komsri

    Point Guard · THA

    1.0 PPG 0.0 RPG 0.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

5.9

PPG

1.0

RPG

4.3

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

38%

3P%

51%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #165

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.9

PPG

1.0

RPG

4.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.9

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.9

P49

Playmaking

4.3

P92

Rebounding

1.0

P20

True shooting

51%

P65

Two-way impact

-31.9

P33

Stops

31%

P8

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

17 made / 39 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

6 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

2PA 233PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

41

PTS

5.9 / game

17–39

FGM–FGA

6–16

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

30

AST

4.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

1.30×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

7

REB

1.0 / game

1

OREB

6

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

12.3

HESI

21.3

PI

81.7

ORtg

113.5

DRtg

-31.9

NRtg

-24.7

Stable NRtg

31%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

51%

eFG%

3%

PIE

105.2

Team DRtg

-8.3

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games140 minutes20.0 min/game70% sample weightrank #165 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.