ORtg
81.7
38th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · TPE · b. 2008
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
4.3 APGCreation · 92nd event percentile
51.4% TSScoring efficiency · 65th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #165 of 188 · Established
HESI
12.3
Event performance
13th event percentile
PI
21.3
Prospect index
13th event percentile
ORtg
81.7
Points / 100 poss.
38th event percentile
DRtg
113.5
Lower is better
20th event percentile
NRtg
-31.9
Two-way margin
33rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 81.7 · 38th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 113.5 · Stop% 31.0% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 140 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
12.3
13th event percentile
Prospect index
21.3
13th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
81.7
38th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
113.5
20th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.9
33rd event percentile
Stop percentage
31.0%
8th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.9 PPG
49th event percentile
Creation
4.3 APG
92nd event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
20th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.4% TS
65th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
4.3 APG · 92nd event percentile
Shooter
38% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 13th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 81.7 ORtg and 113.5 DRtg, producing a -31.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency.
Creation
4.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
31.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive efficiency
113.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
81.7
38th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.9 PPG
49th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.4%
65th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
51.3%
72nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
43.6%
67th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
37.5%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
29th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
35.4%
34th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.3 APG
92nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
113.5
20th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-8.3
9th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
31.0%
8th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
19.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-31.9
33rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-24.7
13th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
12.3
13th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
21.3
13th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.6%
58th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
20th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
140.2
context20.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#165
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
5.9
PPG
1.0
RPG
4.3
APG
#165
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
5.9
PPG
1.0
RPG
4.3
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.9
P49
Playmaking
4.3
P92
Rebounding
1.0
P20
True shooting
51%
P65
Two-way impact
-31.9
P33
Stops
31%
P8
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
44%
17 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
6 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
41
PTS
5.9 / game
17–39
FGM–FGA
6–16
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
4.3 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
1.30×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
6
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
12.3
HESI
21.3
PI
81.7
ORtg
113.5
DRtg
-31.9
NRtg
-24.7
Stable NRtg
31%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
51%
eFG%
3%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#165
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
5.9
PPG
1.0
RPG
4.3
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
38%
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #165
//quick_read
5.9
PPG
1.0
RPG
4.3
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.9
P49
Playmaking
4.3
P92
Rebounding
1.0
P20
True shooting
51%
P65
Two-way impact
-31.9
P33
Stops
31%
P8
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
44%
17 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
6 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
41
PTS
5.9 / game
17–39
FGM–FGA
6–16
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
4.3 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
1.30×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
6
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
12.3
HESI
21.3
PI
81.7
ORtg
113.5
DRtg
-31.9
NRtg
-24.7
Stable NRtg
31%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
51%
eFG%
3%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.