ORtg
111.4
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Zichao Wang
Combo Guard · CHN · b. 2008
//measurables
186 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator7.2 APG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
7.2 APGCreation · 98th event percentile
8.8 PPGScoring load · 72nd event percentile
- 80.8
- HESI v2.1
- #37
- of 188
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #37 of 188 · Established
HESI
80.8
Event performance
81st event percentile
PI
76.1
Prospect index
81st event percentile
ORtg
111.4
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
88.3
Lower is better
84th event percentile
NRtg
+23.1
Two-way margin
79th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 111.4 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.3 · Stop% 59.2% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 134 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
7.2 APG98th event percentile
Scoring load
8.8 PPG72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
80.8
81st event percentile
Prospect index
76.1
81st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
111.4
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.3
84th event percentile
Two-way margin
+23.1
79th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.2%
73rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.8 PPG
72nd event percentile
Creation
7.2 APG
98th event percentile
Rebounding
3.2 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.7% TS
60th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Creator
7.2 APG · 98th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 81st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 111.4 ORtg and 88.3 DRtg, producing a +23.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Creation
7.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Two-way margin
+23.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.8 PPG
72nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
49.7%
60th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.8%
51st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.5%
46th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context4.5 attempts per game
Free throws
91.7%
87th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
48.3%
70th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
7.2 APG
98th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.3
84th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.5
66th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.2%
73rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
32.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+23.1
79th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+13.5
81st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
80.8
81st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
76.1
81st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.2 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
133.5
context22.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#37
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.8
PPG
3.2
RPG
7.2
APG
#37
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#37/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.8
PPG
3.2
RPG
7.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.8
P72
Playmaking
7.2
P98
Rebounding
3.2
P57
True shooting
50%
P60
Two-way impact
+23.1
P79
Stops
59%
P73
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
18 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
92%
11 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
53
PTS
8.8 / game
18–48
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
11–12
FTM–FTA
creation
43
AST
7.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
2.87×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.2 / game
1
OREB
18
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
17
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
80.8
HESI
76.1
PI
111.4
ORtg
88.3
DRtg
+23.1
NRtg
+13.5
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
7%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+0.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #36Mohammad Shamsi AnbouhiPG · IRIrank_below · #38Eishin KonnoPF · JPN
//current_rank
#37
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#35
Power Forward · JPN
8.1 PPG 7.9 RPG 1.9 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.9 RPG + 3.4 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#36
Point Guard · IRI
11.9 PPG 6.6 RPG 7.9 APG
//event_signalCreator7.9 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#38
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.8
PPG
3.2
RPG
7.2
APG
1.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
22%
3P%
50%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #37
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.8
PPG
3.2
RPG
7.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.8
P72
Playmaking
7.2
P98
Rebounding
3.2
P57
True shooting
50%
P60
Two-way impact
+23.1
P79
Stops
59%
P73
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
18 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
92%
11 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
53
PTS
8.8 / game
18–48
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
11–12
FTM–FTA
creation
43
AST
7.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
2.87×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.2 / game
1
OREB
18
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
17
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
80.8
HESI
76.1
PI
111.4
ORtg
88.3
DRtg
+23.1
NRtg
+13.5
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
7%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+0.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.