back_to_rankings
Sudam Liyanage portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Sudam Liyanage

Center · SRI · b. 2008

//measurables

196 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRim Protection1.7 BPG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder7.0 RPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 93rd event percentile

7.0 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile

6.4
HESI v2.1
#176
of 188
58%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #176 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

6.4

Event performance

7th event percentile

PI

16.6

Prospect index

7th event percentile

ORtg

66.7

Points / 100 poss.

24th event percentile

DRtg

113.8

Lower is better

19th event percentile

NRtg

-47.1

Two-way margin

23rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 66.7 · 24th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 113.8 · Stop% 62.9% · Team DRtg 122.0

Sample context

3 games · 83 minutes · 58% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

3.7 stocks93rd event percentile

Rebounding

7.0 RPG89th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

6.4

7th event percentile

Prospect index

16.6

7th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

66.7

24th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

113.8

19th event percentile

Two-way margin

-47.1

23rd event percentile

Stop percentage

62.9%

84th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.3 PPG

68th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

7.0 RPG

89th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.7 stocks

93rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

48.5% TS

57th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P94

    Rim Protection

    1.7 BPG · 94th event percentile

  • P93

    Disruptor

    3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentile

  • P92

    Activity

    7.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentile

  • P89

    Rebounder

    7.0 RPG · 89th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 7th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 66.7 ORtg and 113.8 DRtg, producing a -47.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive activity

    3.7 steals + blocks/G

    93rd event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

  2. Rebounding

    7.0 RPG

    89th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Defensive stops

    62.9% Stop%

    84th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    113.8 DRtg

    19th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Two-way margin

    -47.1 NRtg

    23rd event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    66.7 ORtg

    24th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

66.7

24th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.3 PPG

68th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

48.5%

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

45.8%

59th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

45.8%

75th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

66th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

33.2%

30th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

113.8

19th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

122.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+8.2

95th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

62.9%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.7 STL+BLK

93rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

21.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-47.1

23rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-30.6

7th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

6.4

7th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

16.6

7th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.3%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.0 RPG

89th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

3

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

82.6

context

27.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

57.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#176

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

248.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

3

GP

8.3

PPG

7.0

RPG

1.0

APG

#176

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#176/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

7.0

RPG

1.0

APG

4.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P68

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

7.0

P89

True shooting

49%

P57

Two-way impact

-47.1

P23

Stops

63%

P84

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

46%

11 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

4% of attempts from three

2PA 233PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

25

PTS

8.3 / game

11–24

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

1.0 / game

13

TOV

4.3 / game

0.23×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

21

REB

7.0 / game

6

OREB

15

DREB

7.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

2.0 / game

5

BLK

1.7 / game

12

PF

11

STL+BLK

3.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

6.4

HESI

16.6

PI

66.7

ORtg

113.8

DRtg

-47.1

NRtg

-30.6

Stable NRtg

63%

Stop%

33%

Floor%

46%

eFG%

4%

PIE

122.0

Team DRtg

+8.2

Def. lift

sample_context

3 games83 minutes27.5 min/game58% sample weightrank #176 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Lorenzo Ravazzini portrait#174

    Lorenzo Ravazzini

    Center · THA

    5.0 PPG 5.0 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Raymond Ghosn portrait#175

    Raymond Ghosn

    Forward · LBN

    0.3 PPG 0.3 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Navidu Waduwavalage portrait#177

    Navidu Waduwavalage

    Center · SRI

    0.0 PPG 0.5 RPG 0.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3

GP

8.3

PPG

7.0

RPG

1.0

APG

2.0

SPG

1.7

BPG

0%

3P%

49%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

3 GP · event rank #176

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

7.0

RPG

1.0

APG

4.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P68

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

7.0

P89

True shooting

49%

P57

Two-way impact

-47.1

P23

Stops

63%

P84

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

46%

11 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

4% of attempts from three

2PA 233PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

25

PTS

8.3 / game

11–24

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

1.0 / game

13

TOV

4.3 / game

0.23×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

21

REB

7.0 / game

6

OREB

15

DREB

7.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

2.0 / game

5

BLK

1.7 / game

12

PF

11

STL+BLK

3.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

6.4

HESI

16.6

PI

66.7

ORtg

113.8

DRtg

-47.1

NRtg

-30.6

Stable NRtg

63%

Stop%

33%

Floor%

46%

eFG%

4%

PIE

122.0

Team DRtg

+8.2

Def. lift

sample_context

3 games83 minutes27.5 min/game58% sample weightrank #176 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.