ORtg
66.7
24th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · SRI · b. 2008
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 93rd event percentile
7.0 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #176 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
6.4
Event performance
7th event percentile
PI
16.6
Prospect index
7th event percentile
ORtg
66.7
Points / 100 poss.
24th event percentile
DRtg
113.8
Lower is better
19th event percentile
NRtg
-47.1
Two-way margin
23rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 66.7 · 24th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 113.8 · Stop% 62.9% · Team DRtg 122.0
Sample context
3 games · 83 minutes · 58% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
6.4
7th event percentile
Prospect index
16.6
7th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
66.7
24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
113.8
19th event percentile
Two-way margin
-47.1
23rd event percentile
Stop percentage
62.9%
84th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.3 PPG
68th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
7.0 RPG
89th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.7 stocks
93rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.5% TS
57th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rim Protection
1.7 BPG · 94th event percentile
Disruptor
3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentile
Activity
7.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentile
Rebounder
7.0 RPG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 7th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 66.7 ORtg and 113.8 DRtg, producing a -47.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Defensive activity
3.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Rebounding
7.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
62.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
113.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-47.1 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
66.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
66.7
24th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.3 PPG
68th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.5%
57th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.8%
59th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
45.8%
75th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
33.2%
30th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
113.8
19th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
122.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+8.2
95th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.9%
84th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.7 STL+BLK
93rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
21.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-47.1
23rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-30.6
7th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
6.4
7th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
16.6
7th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.3%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.0 RPG
89th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
82.6
context27.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#176
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
8.3
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#176
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
8.3
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.0
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.3
P68
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
7.0
P89
True shooting
49%
P57
Two-way impact
-47.1
P23
Stops
63%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
11 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
8.3 / game
11–24
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.0 / game
13
TOV
4.3 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
21
REB
7.0 / game
6
OREB
15
DREB
7.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
5
BLK
1.7 / game
12
PF
11
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
6.4
HESI
16.6
PI
66.7
ORtg
113.8
DRtg
-47.1
NRtg
-30.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+8.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#176
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
8.3
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.0
SPG
1.7
BPG
0%
3P%
49%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #176
//quick_read
8.3
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.0
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.3
P68
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
7.0
P89
True shooting
49%
P57
Two-way impact
-47.1
P23
Stops
63%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
11 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
8.3 / game
11–24
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.0 / game
13
TOV
4.3 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
21
REB
7.0 / game
6
OREB
15
DREB
7.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
2.0 / game
5
BLK
1.7 / game
12
PF
11
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
6.4
HESI
16.6
PI
66.7
ORtg
113.8
DRtg
-47.1
NRtg
-30.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
4%
PIE
122.0
Team DRtg
+8.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.