ORtg
95.5
56th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Li-An Chuang
Combo Guard · TPE · b. 2008
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator3.4 APG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter40% 3PT on 2.1 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.4 APGCreation · 88th event percentile
56.3% TSScoring efficiency · 75th event percentile
- 45.5
- HESI v2.1
- #103
- of 188
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #103 of 188 · Established
HESI
45.5
Event performance
45th event percentile
PI
47.9
Prospect index
45th event percentile
ORtg
95.5
Points / 100 poss.
56th event percentile
DRtg
106.5
Lower is better
33rd event percentile
NRtg
-11.0
Two-way margin
47th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 95.5 · 56th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 106.5 · Stop% 47.4% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 111 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.4 APG88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.3% TS75th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
45.5
45th event percentile
Prospect index
47.9
45th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
95.5
56th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
106.5
33rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-11.0
47th event percentile
Stop percentage
47.4%
41st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.1 PPG
38th event percentile
Creation
3.4 APG
88th event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
32nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
47th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.3% TS
75th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P88
Creator
3.4 APG · 88th event percentile
Shooter
40% 3PT on 2.1 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.5 ORtg and 106.5 DRtg, producing a -11.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 88th event percentile
Creation
3.4 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 75th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.3% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 32nd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 33rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
106.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 38th event percentile
Scoring load
4.1 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.1 PPG
38th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.3%
75th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
54.2%
77th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
41.7%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
40.0%
context2.1 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.7%
47th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.4 APG
88th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
106.5
33rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.3
56th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
47.4%
41st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
47th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-11.0
47th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-9.9
45th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
45.5
45th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
47.9
45th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.5%
58th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
32nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
110.7
context15.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#103
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
4.1
PPG
1.7
RPG
3.4
APG
#103
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#103/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.1
PPG
1.7
RPG
3.4
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.1
P38
Playmaking
3.4
P88
Rebounding
1.7
P32
True shooting
56%
P75
Two-way impact
-11.0
P47
Stops
47%
P41
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
42%
10 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
29
PTS
4.1 / game
10–24
FGM–FGA
6–15
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
24
AST
3.4 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
1.71×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
12
REB
1.7 / game
4
OREB
8
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.5
HESI
47.9
PI
95.5
ORtg
106.5
DRtg
-11.0
NRtg
-9.9
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
2%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-1.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #102Geonwoo HeoF · KORrank_below · #104Mahdi Habib Ahmed Fathalla BaqerPG · BRN
//current_rank
#103
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#101
#102
#104
Mahdi Habib Ahmed Fathalla Baqer
Point Guard · BRN
10.3 PPG 2.5 RPG 5.3 APG
//event_signalCreator5.3 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
4.1
PPG
1.7
RPG
3.4
APG
1.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
40%
3P%
56%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #103
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.1
PPG
1.7
RPG
3.4
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.1
P38
Playmaking
3.4
P88
Rebounding
1.7
P32
True shooting
56%
P75
Two-way impact
-11.0
P47
Stops
47%
P41
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
42%
10 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
29
PTS
4.1 / game
10–24
FGM–FGA
6–15
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
24
AST
3.4 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
1.71×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
12
REB
1.7 / game
4
OREB
8
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
45.5
HESI
47.9
PI
95.5
ORtg
106.5
DRtg
-11.0
NRtg
-9.9
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
2%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-1.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.