ORtg
94.9
54th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Aakash Iyappan
Shooting Guard · IND · b. 2008
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalShooter46% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
68.4% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile
6.5 PPGScoring load · 56th event percentile
- 40.6
- HESI v2.1
- #112
- of 188
- 51%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #112 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
40.6
Event performance
41st event percentile
PI
44.0
Prospect index
41st event percentile
ORtg
94.9
Points / 100 poss.
54th event percentile
DRtg
111.3
Lower is better
25th event percentile
NRtg
-16.4
Two-way margin
42nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 94.9 · 54th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 111.3 · Stop% 38.5% · Team DRtg 103.0
Sample context
4 games · 64 minutes · 51% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
68.4% TS95th event percentile
Scoring load
6.5 PPG56th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
40.6
41st event percentile
Prospect index
44.0
41st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
94.9
54th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
111.3
25th event percentile
Two-way margin
-16.4
42nd event percentile
Stop percentage
38.5%
18th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.5 PPG
56th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
13th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
32nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
68.4% TS
95th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Shooter
46% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 41st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.9 ORtg and 111.3 DRtg, producing a -16.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
68.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 13th event percentile
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 18th event percentile
Defensive stops
38.5% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 25th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
111.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.5 PPG
56th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
68.4%
95th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
68.4%
95th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
52.6%
85th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
46.2%
context3.3 attempts per game
Floor%
36.8%
39th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
111.3
25th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
103.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-8.3
9th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
38.5%
18th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
32nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
9.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-16.4
42nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-12.3
41st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
40.6
41st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
44.0
41st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.2%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.8 RPG
13th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
63.6
context15.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
51.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#112
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
315.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
6.5
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.5
APG
#112
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#112/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
68%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P56
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
0.8
P13
True shooting
68%
P95
Two-way impact
-16.4
P42
Stops
39%
P18
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
53%
10 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
46%
6 made / 13 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
68% of attempts from three
●2PA 6●3PA 13
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
6.5 / game
10–19
FGM–FGA
6–13
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.8 / game
0
OREB
3
DREB
0.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
0
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40.6
HESI
44.0
PI
94.9
ORtg
111.3
DRtg
-16.4
NRtg
-12.3
Stable NRtg
39%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
3%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #111Mujtaba Mahmood Isameel Husain Ghuloom RayanG · BRNrank_below · #113AmirMohammad JafarKhaniPF · IRI
//current_rank
#112
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#110
#111
#113
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.5
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
46%
3P%
68%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #112
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
68%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P56
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
0.8
P13
True shooting
68%
P95
Two-way impact
-16.4
P42
Stops
39%
P18
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
53%
10 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
46%
6 made / 13 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
68% of attempts from three
●2PA 6●3PA 13
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
6.5 / game
10–19
FGM–FGA
6–13
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.8 / game
0
OREB
3
DREB
0.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
0
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40.6
HESI
44.0
PI
94.9
ORtg
111.3
DRtg
-16.4
NRtg
-12.3
Stable NRtg
39%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
3%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.