Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

MOhamed Adel Abdulla

Point Guard · BRN · b. 2009

//measurables

177 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.8 APGCreation · 71st event percentile

1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 53rd event percentile

20.9
HESI v2.1: #149
of 188: 63%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #149 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

20.9

Event performance

21st event percentile

28.2

Prospect index

21st event percentile

ORtg

73.8

Points / 100 poss.

30th event percentile

DRtg

104.0

Lower is better

41st event percentile

NRtg

-30.2

Two-way margin

33rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 73.8 · 30th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 104.0 · Stop% 44.2% · Team DRtg 98.4

Sample context

4 games · 101 minutes · 63% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.8 APG71st event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks53rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

20.9

21st event percentile

Prospect index

28.2

21st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

73.8

30th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

104.0

41st event percentile

Two-way margin

-30.2

33rd event percentile

Stop percentage

44.2%

32nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.8 PPG

43rd event percentile

Creation

1.8 APG

71st event percentile

Rebounding

2.0 RPG

36th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

35.2% TS

26th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 21st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.8 ORtg and 104.0 DRtg, producing a -30.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Creation
1.8 APG
71st event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
35.2% TS
26th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
73.8 ORtg
30th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Defensive stops
44.2% Stop%
32nd event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

73.8

30th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.8 PPG

43rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

35.2%

26th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.2%

32nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

29.6%

28th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.0%

context

2.5 attempts per game

Floor%

31.9%

27th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.8 APG

71st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

104.0

41st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

98.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.6

24th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

44.2%

32nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

53rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

18.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-30.2

33rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-21.9

21st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

20.9

21st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

28.2

21st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.2%

31st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.0 RPG

36th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

100.6

context

25.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

62.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#149

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

336.4

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

4.8

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.8

APG

#149

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#149/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.8

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.8

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

35%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.8

P43

Playmaking

1.8

P71

Rebounding

2.0

P36

True shooting

35%

P26

Two-way impact

-30.2

P33

Stops

44%

P32

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

30%

8 made / 27 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

37% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.8 / game

8–27

FGM–FGA

3–10

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.8 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.0 / game

OREB

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.5 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

20.9

HESI

28.2

73.8

ORtg

104.0

DRtg

-30.2

NRtg

-21.9

Stable NRtg

44%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

35%

eFG%

PIE

98.4

Team DRtg

-5.6

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #148Bilal AboallabanPF · SYR

//current_rank

#149

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #150Mateo El KhouryC · LBN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.8

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.8

APG

1.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

30%

3P%

35%

TS%

event_stats