ORtg
79.8
37th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Wachirawich Hatpech
Point Guard · THA · b. 2008
//measurables
168 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator3.7 APG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.7 APGCreation · 90th event percentile
3.3 RPGRebounding · 59th event percentile
- 22.5
- HESI v2.1
- #146
- of 188
- 46%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #146 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
22.5
Event performance
23rd event percentile
PI
29.5
Prospect index
23rd event percentile
ORtg
79.8
Points / 100 poss.
37th event percentile
DRtg
117.3
Lower is better
14th event percentile
NRtg
-37.4
Two-way margin
27th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.8 · 37th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 117.3 · Stop% 54.6% · Team DRtg 121.7
Sample context
3 games · 52 minutes · 46% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.7 APG90th event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG59th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
22.5
23rd event percentile
Prospect index
29.5
23rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.8
37th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
117.3
14th event percentile
Two-way margin
-37.4
27th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.6%
63rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.7 PPG
32nd event percentile
Creation
3.7 APG
90th event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
51st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.3% TS
30th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P90
Creator
3.7 APG · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 23rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.8 ORtg and 117.3 DRtg, producing a -37.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 90th event percentile
Creation
3.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 14th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
117.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 27th event percentile
Two-way margin
-37.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 30th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.3% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.7 PPG
32nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.3%
30th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
39.3%
39th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.6%
26th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.0%
context3.3 attempts per game
Floor%
31.1%
25th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.7 APG
90th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
117.3
14th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
121.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.4
87th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.6%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
51st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
11.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-37.4
27th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-21.6
23rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
22.5
23rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
29.5
23rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
51.5
context17.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
46.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#146
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
248.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
3.7
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.7
APG
#146
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#146/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.7
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.7
P32
Playmaking
3.7
P90
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
39%
P30
Two-way impact
-37.4
P27
Stops
55%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
11
PTS
3.7 / game
4–14
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
3.7 / game
5
TOV
1.7 / game
2.20×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
10
REB
3.3 / game
3
OREB
7
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.5
HESI
29.5
PI
79.8
ORtg
117.3
DRtg
-37.4
NRtg
-21.6
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
31%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
4%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+4.4
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #145Methun WijendraPF · SRIrank_below · #147PUNNATHON AUTHONGSG · THA
//current_rank
#146
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#144
#145
#147
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
3.7
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.7
APG
1.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
30%
3P%
39%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #146
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.7
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.7
P32
Playmaking
3.7
P90
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
39%
P30
Two-way impact
-37.4
P27
Stops
55%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
11
PTS
3.7 / game
4–14
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
3.7 / game
5
TOV
1.7 / game
2.20×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
10
REB
3.3 / game
3
OREB
7
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.5
HESI
29.5
PI
79.8
ORtg
117.3
DRtg
-37.4
NRtg
-21.6
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
31%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
4%
PIE
121.7
Team DRtg
+4.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.