Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Jongwon BAEK portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Jongwon BAEK

Forward · KOR · b. 2008

//measurables

197 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

50.0% TSScoring efficiency · 61st event percentile

0.6 APGCreation · 32nd event percentile

64.7
HESI v2.1
#67
of 188
39%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #67 of 188 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

64.7

Event performance

65th event percentile

PI

63.3

Prospect index

65th event percentile

ORtg

107.9

Points / 100 poss.

72nd event percentile

DRtg

99.5

Lower is better

59th event percentile

NRtg

+8.4

Two-way margin

69th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 107.9 · 72nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 99.5 · Stop% 50.2% · Team DRtg 97.6

Sample context

5 games · 39 minutes · 39% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

50.0% TS61st event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG32nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  3. 03

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

64.7

65th event percentile

Prospect index

63.3

65th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

107.9

72nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

99.5

59th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.4

69th event percentile

Stop percentage

50.2%

51st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.6 PPG

31st event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

32nd event percentile

Rebounding

1.6 RPG

29th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.2 stocks

22nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

50.0% TS

61st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 65th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.9 ORtg and 99.5 DRtg, producing a +8.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity, rebounding, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Offensive efficiency

    107.9 ORtg

    72nd event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  2. Two-way margin

    +8.4 NRtg

    69th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive activity

    0.2 steals + blocks/G

    22nd event percentile

    Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

  2. Rebounding

    1.6 RPG

    29th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  3. Scoring load

    3.6 PPG

    31st event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

107.9

72nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.6 PPG

31st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

50.0%

61st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

50.0%

69th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.9%

49th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.8%

context

2.6 attempts per game

Floor%

42.8%

55th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

32nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

99.5

59th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

97.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.9

52nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

50.2%

51st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.2 STL+BLK

22nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

8.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.4

69th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-1.5

65th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

64.7

65th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

63.3

65th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.6%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.6 RPG

29th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

39.1

context

7.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

39.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#67

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

497.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

5

GP

3.6

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.6

APG

#67

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#67/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.6

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.6

APG

0.0

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.6

P31

Playmaking

0.6

P32

Rebounding

1.6

P29

True shooting

50%

P61

Two-way impact

+8.4

P69

Stops

50%

P51

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

7 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

72% of attempts from three

●2PA 5●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

18

PTS

3.6 / game

7–18

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

0

TOV

0.0 / game

—

AST:TOV

0

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.6 / game

1

OREB

7

DREB

1.6

REB/G

defense

1

STL

0.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

1

STL+BLK

0.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.7

HESI

63.3

PI

107.9

ORtg

99.5

DRtg

+8.4

NRtg

-1.5

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

43%

Floor%

50%

eFG%

2%

PIE

97.6

Team DRtg

-1.9

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games39 minutes7.8 min/game39% sample weightrank #67 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #66Mani Manouchehri GigasariSF · IRI

//current_rank

#67

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #68Tameem Ashraf A M AbuissaF · QAT
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Hussain Fuad Moosa Sharaf Ghuloom portrait#65

    Hussain Fuad Moosa Sharaf Ghuloom

    Forward · BRN

    0.5 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Mani Manouchehri Gigasari portrait#66

    Mani Manouchehri Gigasari

    Small Forward · IRI

    7.1 PPG 5.4 RPG 1.1 APG

  • Tameem Ashraf A M Abuissa portrait#68

    Tameem Ashraf A M Abuissa

    Forward · QAT

    6.8 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

3.6

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.6

APG

0.2

SPG

0.0

BPG

31%

3P%

50%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

5 GP · event rank #67

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.6

PPG

1.6

RPG

0.6

APG

0.0

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.6

P31

Playmaking

0.6

P32

Rebounding

1.6

P29

True shooting

50%

P61

Two-way impact

+8.4

P69

Stops

50%

P51

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

7 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

72% of attempts from three

●2PA 5●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

18

PTS

3.6 / game

7–18

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

0

TOV

0.0 / game

—

AST:TOV

0

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.6 / game

1

OREB

7

DREB

1.6

REB/G

defense

1

STL

0.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

1

STL+BLK

0.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.7

HESI

63.3

PI

107.9

ORtg

99.5

DRtg

+8.4

NRtg

-1.5

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

43%

Floor%

50%

eFG%

2%

PIE

97.6

Team DRtg

-1.9

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games39 minutes7.8 min/game39% sample weightrank #67 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.