ORtg
79.8
36th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Darim Sultanov
Point Guard · KAZ · b. 2008
//measurables
175 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator6.0 APG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.0 APGCreation · 96th event percentile
11.0 PPGScoring load · 83rd event percentile
- 15.5
- HESI v2.1
- #159
- of 188
- 60%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #159 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
15.5
Event performance
16th event percentile
PI
23.9
Prospect index
16th event percentile
ORtg
79.8
Points / 100 poss.
36th event percentile
DRtg
114.5
Lower is better
17th event percentile
NRtg
-34.7
Two-way margin
30th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.8 · 36th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 114.5 · Stop% 38.4% · Team DRtg 110.1
Sample context
3 games · 89 minutes · 60% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
6.0 APG96th event percentile
Scoring load
11.0 PPG83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
15.5
16th event percentile
Prospect index
23.9
16th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.8
36th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
114.5
17th event percentile
Two-way margin
-34.7
30th event percentile
Stop percentage
38.4%
16th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentile
Creation
6.0 APG
96th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
27th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.4% TS
31st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Creator
6.0 APG · 96th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 16th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.8 ORtg and 114.5 DRtg, producing a -34.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Creation
6.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 16th event percentile
Defensive stops
38.4% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 17th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
114.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 27th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.4%
31st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.8%
35th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.8%
24th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
34.6%
context8.7 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
30.0%
24th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
6.0 APG
96th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
114.5
17th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
110.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.5
32nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
38.4%
16th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
27th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
13.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-34.7
30th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-23.9
16th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
15.5
16th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
23.9
16th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.9%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
88.9
context29.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
59.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#159
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
234.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
11.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
6.0
APG
#159
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#159/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
6.0
APG
3.7
TOV/G
3.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
6.0
P96
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
39%
P31
Two-way impact
-34.7
P30
Stops
38%
P16
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
11 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
9 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
11.0 / game
11–41
FGM–FGA
9–26
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
6.0 / game
11
TOV
3.7 / game
1.64×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
3
OREB
12
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
15.5
HESI
23.9
PI
79.8
ORtg
114.5
DRtg
-34.7
NRtg
-23.9
Stable NRtg
38%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
6%
PIE
110.1
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #158Mahmoud Tamer Mahmoud Mohamed IbrahimF · EGY, QATrank_below · #160Jad HammoudPF · CAN, LBN
//current_rank
#159
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#157
#158
#160
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
11.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
6.0
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
35%
3P%
39%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #159
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
6.0
APG
3.7
TOV/G
3.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
6.0
P96
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
39%
P31
Two-way impact
-34.7
P30
Stops
38%
P16
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
11 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
9 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
11.0 / game
11–41
FGM–FGA
9–26
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
6.0 / game
11
TOV
3.7 / game
1.64×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
15
REB
5.0 / game
3
OREB
12
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
15.5
HESI
23.9
PI
79.8
ORtg
114.5
DRtg
-34.7
NRtg
-23.9
Stable NRtg
38%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
6%
PIE
110.1
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.