Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Patrick Laurence Pasinos

Forward · PHI · b. 2008

//measurables

193 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

4.4 RPGRebounding · 70th event percentile

1.1 stocksDefensive activity · 61st event percentile

19.3
HESI v2.1: #152
of 188: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #152 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

19.3

Event performance

19th event percentile

26.9

Prospect index

19th event percentile

ORtg

72.1

Points / 100 poss.

28th event percentile

DRtg

101.0

Lower is better

55th event percentile

NRtg

-28.9

Two-way margin

34th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 72.1 · 28th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 101.0 · Stop% 56.7% · Team DRtg 102.3

Sample context

7 games · 124 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

4.4 RPG70th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks61st event percentile

Questions for film

01
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

19.3

19th event percentile

Prospect index

26.9

19th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

72.1

28th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

101.0

55th event percentile

Two-way margin

-28.9

34th event percentile

Stop percentage

56.7%

68th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.9 PPG

35th event percentile

Creation

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Rebounding

4.4 RPG

70th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks

61st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.1% TS

40th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 19th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 72.1 ORtg and 101.0 DRtg, producing a -28.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
4.4 RPG
70th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
56.7% Stop%
68th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
72.1 ORtg
28th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Two-way margin
-28.9 NRtg
34th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring load
3.9 PPG
35th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

72.1

28th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.9 PPG

35th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

43.1%

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

43.3%

48th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.7%

43rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.8%

context

1.9 attempts per game

Free throws

33.3%

14th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

31.4%

25th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

101.0

55th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

102.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.3

70th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

56.7%

68th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.1 STL+BLK

61st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

29.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-28.9

34th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-22.1

19th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

19.3

19th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

26.9

19th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.9%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.4 RPG

70th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

124.4

context

17.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#152

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

592.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

3.9

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

#152

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#152/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.9

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.9

P35

Playmaking

1.4

P58

Rebounding

4.4

P70

True shooting

43%

P40

Two-way impact

-28.9

P34

Stops

57%

P68

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

37%

11 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

43% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.9 / game

11–30

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.4 / game

TOV

2.3 / game

0.63×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.4 / game

OREB

DREB

4.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.9 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

1.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

19.3

HESI

26.9

72.1

ORtg

101.0

DRtg

-28.9

NRtg

-22.1

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

43%

eFG%

PIE

102.3

Team DRtg

+1.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #151Chusonjakku ShirataniPF · JPN

//current_rank

#152

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #153Thierry DerjaniG · LBN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.9

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

0.9

SPG

0.3

BPG

31%

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats