ORtg
117.4
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Taejoon PARK
Combo Guard · KOR · b. 2009
//measurables
182 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Efficiency62% TS on 10.8 PPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
61.5% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile
10.8 PPGScoring load · 82nd event percentile
- 79.1
- HESI v2.1
- #40
- of 188
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #40 of 188 · Established
HESI
79.1
Event performance
79th event percentile
PI
74.8
Prospect index
79th event percentile
ORtg
117.4
Points / 100 poss.
81st event percentile
DRtg
96.1
Lower is better
69th event percentile
NRtg
+21.3
Two-way margin
77th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 117.4 · 81st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 96.1 · Stop% 58.1% · Team DRtg 97.6
Sample context
6 games · 132 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
61.5% TS87th event percentile
Scoring load
10.8 PPG82nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
79.1
79th event percentile
Prospect index
74.8
79th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
117.4
81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
96.1
69th event percentile
Two-way margin
+21.3
77th event percentile
Stop percentage
58.1%
72nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.8 PPG
82nd event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
67th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.2 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
61.5% TS
87th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P87
Event Efficiency
62% TS on 10.8 PPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 79th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 117.4 ORtg and 96.1 DRtg, producing a +21.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
61.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 82nd event percentile
Scoring load
10.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
117.4 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 40th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.8 PPG
82nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
61.5%
87th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
57.3%
82nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
52.1%
85th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
27.8%
context3.0 attempts per game
Free throws
90.9%
86th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
52.8%
81st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
67th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
96.1
69th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
97.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.5
71st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
58.1%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.2 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+21.3
77th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+12.1
79th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
79.1
79th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.8
79th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.8%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.2 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
132.0
context22.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#40
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
497.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.8
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.7
APG
#40
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#40/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.7
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
62%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P82
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
2.2
P40
True shooting
62%
P87
Two-way impact
+21.3
P77
Stops
58%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
52%
25 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
10 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
65
PTS
10.8 / game
25–48
FGM–FGA
5–18
3PM–3PA
10–11
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
2
OREB
11
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
79.1
HESI
74.8
PI
117.4
ORtg
96.1
DRtg
+21.3
NRtg
+12.1
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
7%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #39Kiyasha TaheriSG · IRIrank_below · #41MohammadSaleh PakgoharC · IRI
//current_rank
#40
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#38
#39
#41
Center · IRI
2.7 PPG 4.8 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalRim Protection2.2 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.8
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.7
APG
2.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
28%
3P%
62%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #40
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
2.2
RPG
1.7
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
62%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P82
Playmaking
1.7
P67
Rebounding
2.2
P40
True shooting
62%
P87
Two-way impact
+21.3
P77
Stops
58%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
52%
25 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
10 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 30●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
65
PTS
10.8 / game
25–48
FGM–FGA
5–18
3PM–3PA
10–11
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
2
OREB
11
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
79.1
HESI
74.8
PI
117.4
ORtg
96.1
DRtg
+21.3
NRtg
+12.1
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
7%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.