Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
MohammadSaleh Pakgohar portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

MohammadSaleh Pakgohar

Center · IRI · b. 2009

//measurables

208 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRim Protection2.2 BPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDefensive Impact80.8 DRtg · 87% Stop% · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

66.7% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile

4.8 RPGRebounding · 75th event percentile

78.6
HESI v2.1
#41
of 188
55%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #41 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

78.6

Event performance

78th event percentile

PI

74.4

Prospect index

78th event percentile

ORtg

106.4

Points / 100 poss.

70th event percentile

DRtg

80.8

Lower is better

94th event percentile

NRtg

+25.6

Two-way margin

81st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 106.4 · 70th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 80.8 · Stop% 87.3% · Team DRtg 94.0

Sample context

6 games · 73 minutes · 55% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

66.7% TS91st event percentile

Rebounding

4.8 RPG75th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

78.6

78th event percentile

Prospect index

74.4

78th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

106.4

70th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

80.8

94th event percentile

Two-way margin

+25.6

81st event percentile

Stop percentage

87.3%

99th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.7 PPG

27th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

4.8 RPG

75th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.8 stocks

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

66.7% TS

91st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P97

    Rim Protection

    2.2 BPG · 97th event percentile

  • P97

    Defensive Impact

    80.8 DRtg · 87% Stop% · 97th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 78th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 106.4 ORtg and 80.8 DRtg, producing a +25.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    87.3% Stop%

    99th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    80.8 DRtg

    94th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    66.7% TS

    91st event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    2.7 PPG

    27th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

106.4

70th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.7 PPG

27th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

66.7%

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

66.7%

93rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

66.7%

97th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Floor%

51.1%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

80.8

94th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

94.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+13.2

99th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

87.3%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.8 STL+BLK

73rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

25.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+25.6

81st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+10.4

78th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

78.6

78th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

74.4

78th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.1%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.8 RPG

75th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

72.8

context

12.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

54.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#41

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

569.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

2.7

PPG

4.8

RPG

1.0

APG

#41

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#41/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.7

PPG

4.8

RPG

1.0

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

67%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.7

P27

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

4.8

P75

True shooting

67%

P91

Two-way impact

+25.6

P81

Stops

87%

P100

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

67%

8 made / 12 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

16

PTS

2.7 / game

8–12

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.0 / game

6

TOV

1.0 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

1

FD

rebounding

29

REB

4.8 / game

8

OREB

21

DREB

4.8

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.7 / game

13

BLK

2.2 / game

15

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

78.6

HESI

74.4

PI

106.4

ORtg

80.8

DRtg

+25.6

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

87%

Stop%

51%

Floor%

67%

eFG%

3%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

+13.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games73 minutes12.1 min/game55% sample weightrank #41 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #40Taejoon PARKG · KOR

//current_rank

#41

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #42Sungmin EOMC · KOR
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Kiyasha Taheri portrait#39

    Kiyasha Taheri

    Shooting Guard · IRI

    2.8 PPG 1.3 RPG 1.0 APG

  • Taejoon PARK portrait#40

    Taejoon PARK

    Guard · KOR

    10.8 PPG 2.2 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalEvent Efficiency62% TS on 10.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Sungmin EOM portrait#42

    Sungmin EOM

    Center · KOR

    6.3 PPG 4.5 RPG 0.8 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

2.7

PPG

4.8

RPG

1.0

APG

0.7

SPG

2.2

BPG

—

3P%

67%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #41

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.7

PPG

4.8

RPG

1.0

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

67%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.7

P27

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

4.8

P75

True shooting

67%

P91

Two-way impact

+25.6

P81

Stops

87%

P100

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

67%

8 made / 12 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

16

PTS

2.7 / game

8–12

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.0 / game

6

TOV

1.0 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

1

FD

rebounding

29

REB

4.8 / game

8

OREB

21

DREB

4.8

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.7 / game

13

BLK

2.2 / game

15

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

78.6

HESI

74.4

PI

106.4

ORtg

80.8

DRtg

+25.6

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

87%

Stop%

51%

Floor%

67%

eFG%

3%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

+13.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games73 minutes12.1 min/game55% sample weightrank #41 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.