ORtg
116.5
80th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Sungmin EOM
Center · KOR · b. 2008
//measurables
199 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.7 stocksDefensive activity · 75th event percentile
4.5 RPGRebounding · 71st event percentile
- 78.1
- HESI v2.1
- #42
- of 188
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #42 of 188 · Established
HESI
78.1
Event performance
78th event percentile
PI
74.0
Prospect index
78th event percentile
ORtg
116.5
Points / 100 poss.
80th event percentile
DRtg
98.1
Lower is better
61st event percentile
NRtg
+18.4
Two-way margin
75th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 116.5 · 80th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 98.1 · Stop% 53.3% · Team DRtg 97.6
Sample context
6 games · 135 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks75th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG71st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
78.1
78th event percentile
Prospect index
74.0
78th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
116.5
80th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
98.1
61st event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.4
75th event percentile
Stop percentage
53.3%
58th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.3 PPG
55th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
39th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
71st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
75th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.4% TS
69th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 78th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 116.5 ORtg and 98.1 DRtg, producing a +18.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, defensive activity, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is creation.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
116.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 75th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 75th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 39th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.3 PPG
55th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.4%
69th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.2%
56th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
45.2%
73rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.5 attempts per game
Free throws
83.3%
81st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.9%
86th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
39th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
98.1
61st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
97.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.6
58th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.3%
58th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
75th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
29.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.4
75th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+10.3
78th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
78.1
78th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.0
78th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.1%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
71st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
135.0
context22.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#42
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
497.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.3
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
#42
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#42/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.3
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.3
P55
Playmaking
0.8
P39
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
52%
P69
Two-way impact
+18.4
P75
Stops
53%
P58
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
45%
14 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
83%
10 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
38
PTS
6.3 / game
14–31
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
10–12
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
8
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.1
HESI
74.0
PI
116.5
ORtg
98.1
DRtg
+18.4
NRtg
+10.3
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
5%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
-0.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #41MohammadSaleh PakgoharC · IRIrank_below · #43Kaito NakamuraF · JPN
//current_rank
#42
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#40
Guard · KOR
10.8 PPG 2.2 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalEvent Efficiency62% TS on 10.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#41
Center · IRI
2.7 PPG 4.8 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalRim Protection2.2 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#43
Forward · JPN
12.0 PPG 2.7 RPG 4.9 APG
//event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 4.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.3
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
1.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
0%
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #42
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.3
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.8
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.3
P55
Playmaking
0.8
P39
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
52%
P69
Two-way impact
+18.4
P75
Stops
53%
P58
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
45%
14 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
83%
10 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
38
PTS
6.3 / game
14–31
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
10–12
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
8
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.1
HESI
74.0
PI
116.5
ORtg
98.1
DRtg
+18.4
NRtg
+10.3
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
5%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
-0.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.