back_to_rankings
Kaito Nakamura portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Kaito Nakamura

Forward · JPN · b. 2008

//measurables

179 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator4.9 APG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer12.0 PPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 4.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

4.9 APGCreation · 94th event percentile

12.0 PPGScoring load · 88th event percentile

77.5
HESI v2.1
#43
of 188
74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #43 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

77.5

Event performance

77th event percentile

PI

73.5

Prospect index

77th event percentile

ORtg

113.6

Points / 100 poss.

77th event percentile

DRtg

97.3

Lower is better

65th event percentile

NRtg

+16.3

Two-way margin

73rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 113.6 · 77th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 97.3 · Stop% 46.9% · Team DRtg 93.1

Sample context

7 games · 167 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.9 APG94th event percentile

Scoring load

12.0 PPG88th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

77.5

77th event percentile

Prospect index

73.5

77th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

113.6

77th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

97.3

65th event percentile

Two-way margin

+16.3

73rd event percentile

Stop percentage

46.9%

39th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.0 PPG

88th event percentile

Creation

4.9 APG

94th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

53.0% TS

70th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P94

    Creator

    4.9 APG · 94th event percentile

  • P88

    Scorer

    12.0 PPG · 88th event percentile

  • Shooter

    39% 3PT on 4.4 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 77th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 113.6 ORtg and 97.3 DRtg, producing a +16.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is defensive stops.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.9 APG

    94th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    12.0 PPG

    88th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    113.6 ORtg

    77th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    46.9% Stop%

    39th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

113.6

77th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.0 PPG

88th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

53.0%

70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

47.1%

62nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.6%

48th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

38.7%

context

4.4 attempts per game

Free throws

85.7%

83rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

48.0%

69th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.9 APG

94th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

97.3

65th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

93.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.2

33rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

46.9%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.9 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

29.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+16.3

73rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+9.9

77th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

77.5

77th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

73.5

77th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.5%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.6

context

23.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#43

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

531.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

7

GP

12.0

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.9

APG

#43

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#43/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.0

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.9

APG

2.0

TOV/G

1.7

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.0

P88

Playmaking

4.9

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P51

True shooting

53%

P70

Two-way impact

+16.3

P73

Stops

47%

P39

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

27 made / 70 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

39%

12 made / 31 attempts

FT

Free throws

86%

18 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

44% of attempts from three

2PA 393PA 31

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

84

PTS

12.0 / game

27–70

FGM–FGA

12–31

3PM–3PA

18–21

FTM–FTA

creation

34

AST

4.9 / game

14

TOV

2.0 / game

2.43×

AST:TOV

21

FD

rebounding

19

REB

2.7 / game

2

OREB

17

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

6

STL

0.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

6

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

77.5

HESI

73.5

PI

113.6

ORtg

97.3

DRtg

+16.3

NRtg

+9.9

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

48%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

8%

PIE

93.1

Team DRtg

-4.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games167 minutes23.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #43 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • MohammadSaleh Pakgohar portrait#41

    MohammadSaleh Pakgohar

    Center · IRI

    2.7 PPG 4.8 RPG 1.0 APG

    //event_signalRim Protection2.2 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Sungmin EOM portrait#42

    Sungmin EOM

    Center · KOR

    6.3 PPG 4.5 RPG 0.8 APG

  • Jan Bennett Cagurungan portrait#44

    Jan Bennett Cagurungan

    Shooting Guard · PHI

    9.9 PPG 2.3 RPG 0.4 APG

    //event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 6.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

12.0

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.9

APG

0.9

SPG

0.0

BPG

39%

3P%

53%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #43

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.0

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.9

APG

2.0

TOV/G

1.7

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.0

P88

Playmaking

4.9

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P51

True shooting

53%

P70

Two-way impact

+16.3

P73

Stops

47%

P39

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

27 made / 70 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

39%

12 made / 31 attempts

FT

Free throws

86%

18 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

44% of attempts from three

2PA 393PA 31

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

84

PTS

12.0 / game

27–70

FGM–FGA

12–31

3PM–3PA

18–21

FTM–FTA

creation

34

AST

4.9 / game

14

TOV

2.0 / game

2.43×

AST:TOV

21

FD

rebounding

19

REB

2.7 / game

2

OREB

17

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

6

STL

0.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

6

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

77.5

HESI

73.5

PI

113.6

ORtg

97.3

DRtg

+16.3

NRtg

+9.9

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

48%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

8%

PIE

93.1

Team DRtg

-4.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games167 minutes23.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #43 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.