ORtg
126.6
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Jan Bennett Cagurungan
Shooting Guard · PHI · b. 2008
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact126.6 ORtg · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency64% TS on 9.9 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 6.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
63.5% TSScoring efficiency · 89th event percentile
9.9 PPGScoring load · 75th event percentile
- 77.0
- HESI v2.1
- #44
- of 188
- 72%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #44 of 188 · Established
HESI
77.0
Event performance
77th event percentile
PI
73.1
Prospect index
77th event percentile
ORtg
126.6
Points / 100 poss.
89th event percentile
DRtg
110.3
Lower is better
27th event percentile
NRtg
+16.4
Two-way margin
74th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 126.6 · 89th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 110.3 · Stop% 35.6% · Team DRtg 102.3
Sample context
7 games · 151 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
63.5% TS89th event percentile
Scoring load
9.9 PPG75th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
77.0
77th event percentile
Prospect index
73.1
77th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
126.6
89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
110.3
27th event percentile
Two-way margin
+16.4
74th event percentile
Stop percentage
35.6%
14th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.9 PPG
75th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
26th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
42nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
63.5% TS
89th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Offensive Impact
126.6 ORtg · 89th event percentile
- P89
Event Efficiency
64% TS on 9.9 PPG · 89th event percentile
Shooter
44% 3PT on 6.4 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 77th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 126.6 ORtg and 110.3 DRtg, producing a +16.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, creation, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
126.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 89th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
63.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 75th event percentile
Scoring load
9.9 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 14th event percentile
Defensive stops
35.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 26th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 27th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
110.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.9 PPG
75th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
63.5%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
62.3%
89th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
43.4%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
44.4%
context6.4 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.3%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
26th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
110.3
27th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
102.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.9
10th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
35.6%
14th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
22.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+16.4
74th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.5
77th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
77.0
77th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
73.1
77th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.2%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
42nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
151.3
context21.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#44
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
592.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
9.9
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.4
APG
#44
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#44/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.9
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.4
APG
0.6
TOV/G
2.9
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.9
P75
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
2.3
P42
True shooting
64%
P89
Two-way impact
+16.4
P74
Stops
36%
P14
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
23 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
44%
20 made / 45 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
3 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
85% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 45
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
69
PTS
9.9 / game
23–53
FGM–FGA
20–45
3PM–3PA
3–3
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.4 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
4
OREB
12
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
6
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
77.0
HESI
73.1
PI
126.6
ORtg
110.3
DRtg
+16.4
NRtg
+9.5
Stable NRtg
36%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
62%
eFG%
5%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
-7.9
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #43Kaito NakamuraF · JPNrank_below · #45MAJAK AWUTIAK MATHIANG MAJAKC · SSD, SYR
//current_rank
#44
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#42
#43
Forward · JPN
12.0 PPG 2.7 RPG 4.9 APG
//event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 4.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#45
Center · SSD, SYR
14.0 PPG 10.0 RPG 0.8 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.0 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity10.0 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
9.9
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.4
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
44%
3P%
64%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #44
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.9
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.4
APG
0.6
TOV/G
2.9
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.9
P75
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
2.3
P42
True shooting
64%
P89
Two-way impact
+16.4
P74
Stops
36%
P14
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
23 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
44%
20 made / 45 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
3 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
85% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 45
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
69
PTS
9.9 / game
23–53
FGM–FGA
20–45
3PM–3PA
3–3
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.4 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
4
OREB
12
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
6
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
77.0
HESI
73.1
PI
126.6
ORtg
110.3
DRtg
+16.4
NRtg
+9.5
Stable NRtg
36%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
62%
eFG%
5%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
-7.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.