back_to_rankings
MAJAK AWUTIAK MATHIANG MAJAK portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

MAJAK AWUTIAK MATHIANG MAJAK

Center · SSD, SYR · b. 2009

//measurables

211 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRebounder10.0 RPG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.8 BPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer14.0 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity10.0 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/G · 83rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

10.0 RPGRebounding · 98th event percentile

14.0 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile

76.5
HESI v2.1
#45
of 188
67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #45 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

76.5

Event performance

76th event percentile

PI

72.7

Prospect index

76th event percentile

ORtg

107.6

Points / 100 poss.

72nd event percentile

DRtg

91.5

Lower is better

78th event percentile

NRtg

+16.2

Two-way margin

73rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 107.6 · 72nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 91.5 · Stop% 62.5% · Team DRtg 94.2

Sample context

4 games · 120 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

10.0 RPG98th event percentile

Scoring load

14.0 PPG91st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

76.5

76th event percentile

Prospect index

72.7

76th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

107.6

72nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

91.5

78th event percentile

Two-way margin

+16.2

73rd event percentile

Stop percentage

62.5%

82nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

14.0 PPG

91st event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

37th event percentile

Rebounding

10.0 RPG

98th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.5 stocks

76th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

55.2% TS

73rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P98

    Rebounder

    10.0 RPG · 98th event percentile

  • P95

    Rim Protection

    1.8 BPG · 95th event percentile

  • P91

    Scorer

    14.0 PPG · 91st event percentile

  • P83

    Activity

    10.0 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/G · 83rd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.6 ORtg and 91.5 DRtg, producing a +16.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Rebounding

    10.0 RPG

    98th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  2. Scoring load

    14.0 PPG

    91st event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Defensive stops

    62.5% Stop%

    82nd event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.8 APG

    37th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

107.6

72nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

14.0 PPG

91st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

55.2%

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

59.8%

85th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

56.1%

89th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

60.0%

context

1.3 attempts per game

Free throws

31.8%

13th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

53.3%

81st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

37th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

91.5

78th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

94.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.7

80th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

62.5%

82nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.5 STL+BLK

76th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

29.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+16.2

73rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+8.1

76th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

76.5

76th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

72.7

76th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

13.9%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

10.0 RPG

98th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

120.2

context

30.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

66.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#45

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

313.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

4

GP

14.0

PPG

10.0

RPG

0.8

APG

#45

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#45/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

14.0

PPG

10.0

RPG

0.8

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

14.0

P91

Playmaking

0.8

P37

Rebounding

10.0

P98

True shooting

55%

P73

Two-way impact

+16.2

P73

Stops

62%

P82

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

56%

23 made / 41 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

60%

3 made / 5 attempts

FT

Free throws

32%

7 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

12% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

56

PTS

14.0 / game

23–41

FGM–FGA

3–5

3PM–3PA

7–22

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.8 / game

6

TOV

1.5 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

40

REB

10.0 / game

15

OREB

25

DREB

10.0

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.8 / game

7

BLK

1.8 / game

9

PF

10

STL+BLK

2.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

76.5

HESI

72.7

PI

107.6

ORtg

91.5

DRtg

+16.2

NRtg

+8.1

Stable NRtg

62%

Stop%

53%

Floor%

60%

eFG%

14%

PIE

94.2

Team DRtg

+2.7

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games120 minutes30.1 min/game67% sample weightrank #45 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Kaito Nakamura portrait#43

    Kaito Nakamura

    Forward · JPN

    12.0 PPG 2.7 RPG 4.9 APG

    //event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 4.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Jan Bennett Cagurungan portrait#44

    Jan Bennett Cagurungan

    Shooting Guard · PHI

    9.9 PPG 2.3 RPG 0.4 APG

    //event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 6.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Harry Kelso portrait#46

    Harry Kelso

    Guard · NZL

    4.3 PPG 5.0 RPG 2.2 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

14.0

PPG

10.0

RPG

0.8

APG

0.8

SPG

1.8

BPG

60%

3P%

55%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

4 GP · event rank #45

//quick_read

The line at a glance

14.0

PPG

10.0

RPG

0.8

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

14.0

P91

Playmaking

0.8

P37

Rebounding

10.0

P98

True shooting

55%

P73

Two-way impact

+16.2

P73

Stops

62%

P82

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

56%

23 made / 41 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

60%

3 made / 5 attempts

FT

Free throws

32%

7 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

12% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

56

PTS

14.0 / game

23–41

FGM–FGA

3–5

3PM–3PA

7–22

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.8 / game

6

TOV

1.5 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

40

REB

10.0 / game

15

OREB

25

DREB

10.0

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.8 / game

7

BLK

1.8 / game

9

PF

10

STL+BLK

2.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

76.5

HESI

72.7

PI

107.6

ORtg

91.5

DRtg

+16.2

NRtg

+8.1

Stable NRtg

62%

Stop%

53%

Floor%

60%

eFG%

14%

PIE

94.2

Team DRtg

+2.7

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games120 minutes30.1 min/game67% sample weightrank #45 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.