ORtg
102.2
63rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Harry Kelso
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
//measurables
194 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
58.6% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
2.2 APGCreation · 79th event percentile
- 75.9
- HESI v2.1
- #46
- of 188
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #46 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
75.9
Event performance
76th event percentile
PI
72.3
Prospect index
76th event percentile
ORtg
102.2
Points / 100 poss.
63rd event percentile
DRtg
84.7
Lower is better
89th event percentile
NRtg
+17.4
Two-way margin
74th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 102.2 · 63rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 84.7 · Stop% 60.8% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
58.6% TS82nd event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG79th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
75.9
76th event percentile
Prospect index
72.3
76th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
102.2
63rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.7
89th event percentile
Two-way margin
+17.4
74th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.8%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.3 PPG
40th event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
79th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
50th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.6% TS
82nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 102.2 ORtg and 84.7 DRtg, producing a +17.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
84.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Defensive stops
60.8% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 40th event percentile
Scoring load
4.3 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.3 PPG
40th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.6%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
60.0%
85th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
83rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
40.0%
18th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.6%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.2 APG
79th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
84.7
89th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.1
63rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.8%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
50th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+17.4
74th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.9
76th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
75.9
76th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
72.3
76th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.5%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
99.3
context16.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#46
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.2
APG
#46
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#46/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.2
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.3
P40
Playmaking
2.2
P79
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
59%
P82
Two-way impact
+17.4
P74
Stops
61%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
10 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
4.3 / game
10–20
FGM–FGA
4–12
3PM–3PA
2–5
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.30×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
8
OREB
22
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.9
HESI
72.3
PI
102.2
ORtg
84.7
DRtg
+17.4
NRtg
+7.9
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
46%
Floor%
60%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+0.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #45MAJAK AWUTIAK MATHIANG MAJAKC · SSD, SYRrank_below · #47Arana RobertsonG · NZL
//current_rank
#46
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#44
Shooting Guard · PHI
9.9 PPG 2.3 RPG 0.4 APG
//event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 6.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#45
Center · SSD, SYR
14.0 PPG 10.0 RPG 0.8 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.0 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity10.0 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#47
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.2
APG
0.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
33%
3P%
59%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #46
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.2
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.3
P40
Playmaking
2.2
P79
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
59%
P82
Two-way impact
+17.4
P74
Stops
61%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
10 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 8●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
4.3 / game
10–20
FGM–FGA
4–12
3PM–3PA
2–5
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.30×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
8
OREB
22
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.9
HESI
72.3
PI
102.2
ORtg
84.7
DRtg
+17.4
NRtg
+7.9
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
46%
Floor%
60%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+0.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.