ORtg
102.4
64th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Arana Robertson
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 Asia Cup
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.3 APGCreation · 81st event percentile
4.7 RPGRebounding · 73rd event percentile
- 75.4
- HESI v2.1
- #47
- of 188
- 70%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #47 of 188 · Established
HESI
75.4
Event performance
75th event percentile
PI
71.8
Prospect index
75th event percentile
ORtg
102.4
Points / 100 poss.
64th event percentile
DRtg
87.8
Lower is better
86th event percentile
NRtg
+14.6
Two-way margin
72nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 102.4 · 64th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.8 · Stop% 53.8% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 139 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.3 APG81st event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG73rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
75.4
75th event percentile
Prospect index
71.8
75th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
102.4
64th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.8
86th event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.6
72nd event percentile
Stop percentage
53.8%
60th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.5 PPG
69th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
81st event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
73rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS
49th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 75th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 102.4 ORtg and 87.8 DRtg, producing a +14.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 73rd event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 37th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.5 PPG
69th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.4%
49th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
39.4%
39th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.2%
41st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
15.8%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
77.8%
70th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.8%
67th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
81st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.8
86th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.9
44th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.8%
60th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
29.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.6
72nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.8
75th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
75.4
75th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
71.8
75th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.9%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
73rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
138.5
context23.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#47
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs Vs Japan · 2026-09-23 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-23
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded spacing / shooting option · expanded secondary creator / connector
combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded spacing / shooting option · expanded secondary creator / connector. Best current separators: Ball-screen creation, Gap help, Finishing, Primary initiation.
Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard
Translatable strengths
- · Ball-screen creation
- · Gap help
- · Finishing
- · Primary initiation
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Can take on more on-ball creator responsibility at the target level. Can take on more spacing / shooting option responsibility at the target level. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Can organize a spaced ball-screen offense as an initiator. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Can take point-of-attack assignments in a coverage with clearly defined screen rules. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A static offense asking her to create every late-clock advantage without a second handler. A low-spacing environment that removes driving and connective passing windows.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive75.4 performance rating · rank 47 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 102.4 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive47.8% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive53.8% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
#47
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#47/188Event board →
6
GP
8.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 · 188 ranked players
rank_above · #46Harry KelsoG · NZLrank_below · #48Hunter SavillG · NZL
//current_rank
#47
of 188 ranked
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#45
Center · SSD, SYR
14.0 PPG 10.0 RPG 0.8 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.0 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity10.0 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
16%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #47
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.5
P69
Playmaking
2.3
P81
Rebounding
4.7
P73
True shooting
46%
P49
Two-way impact
+14.6
P72
Stops
54%
P60
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
17 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
16%
3 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
14 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
8.5 / game
17–47
FGM–FGA
3–19
3PM–3PA
14–18
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.40×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
28
REB
4.7 / game
7
OREB
21
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.4
HESI
71.8
PI
102.4
ORtg
87.8
DRtg
+14.6
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-2.9
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.