ORtg
106.0
70th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Hunter Savill
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.7 APGCreation · 84th event percentile
54.6% TSScoring efficiency · 72nd event percentile
- 74.9
- HESI v2.1
- #48
- of 188
- 55%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #48 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
74.9
Event performance
75th event percentile
PI
71.4
Prospect index
75th event percentile
ORtg
106.0
Points / 100 poss.
70th event percentile
DRtg
87.1
Lower is better
86th event percentile
NRtg
+18.9
Two-way margin
76th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 106.0 · 70th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.1 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 73 minutes · 55% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.7 APG84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
54.6% TS72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
74.9
75th event percentile
Prospect index
71.4
75th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
106.0
70th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.1
86th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.9
76th event percentile
Stop percentage
55.4%
64th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
37th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
84th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
54.6% TS
72nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 75th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 106.0 ORtg and 87.1 DRtg, producing a +18.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, defensive activity, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 84th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.9 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 37th event percentile
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 37th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 40th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
37th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
54.6%
72nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
44.4%
71st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context1.2 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
48th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
49.3%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.7 APG
84th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.1
86th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.2
49th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.4%
64th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
15.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.9
76th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+6.8
75th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
74.9
75th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
71.4
75th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.7%
58th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.2 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
72.5
context12.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
54.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#48
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.7
APG
#48
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#48/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P37
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
2.2
P40
True shooting
55%
P72
Two-way impact
+18.9
P76
Stops
55%
P64
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
6 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
6–9
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
1.78×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
6
OREB
7
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
74.9
HESI
71.4
PI
106.0
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
+18.9
NRtg
+6.8
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
49%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #47Arana RobertsonG · NZLrank_below · #49Vitaliy ShmikPF · KAZ
//current_rank
#48
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#46
#47
#49
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.7
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
29%
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #48
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P37
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
2.2
P40
True shooting
55%
P72
Two-way impact
+18.9
P76
Stops
55%
P64
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
8 made / 18 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
6 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–18
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
6–9
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
1.78×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
13
REB
2.2 / game
6
OREB
7
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
74.9
HESI
71.4
PI
106.0
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
+18.9
NRtg
+6.8
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
49%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.