ORtg
95.3
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · SYR · b. 2009
//measurables
197 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
4.3 APGCreation · 92nd event percentile
6.5 RPGRebounding · 87th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #64 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
66.3
Event performance
66th event percentile
PI
64.5
Prospect index
66th event percentile
ORtg
95.3
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
92.8
Lower is better
76th event percentile
NRtg
+2.5
Two-way margin
64th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 95.3 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 92.8 · Stop% 59.2% · Team DRtg 94.2
Sample context
4 games · 124 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
66.3
66th event percentile
Prospect index
64.5
66th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
95.3
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
92.8
76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.5
64th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.2%
74th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.8 PPG
71st event percentile
Creation
4.3 APG
92nd event percentile
Rebounding
6.5 RPG
87th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.0% TS
61st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
4.3 APG · 92nd event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile
Rebounder
6.5 RPG · 87th event percentile
Activity
6.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 66th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.3 ORtg and 92.8 DRtg, producing a +2.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Creation
4.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
6.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
2.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
95.3
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.8 PPG
71st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.0%
61st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
27.8%
context4.5 attempts per game
Floor%
41.2%
49th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.3 APG
92nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
92.8
76th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
94.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.3
70th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.2%
74th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
81st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.5
64th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-0.9
66th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
66.3
66th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
64.5
66th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.1%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.5 RPG
87th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
123.7
context30.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#64
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
313.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
8.8
PPG
6.5
RPG
4.3
APG
#64
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
8.8
PPG
6.5
RPG
4.3
APG
2.8
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.8
P71
Playmaking
4.3
P92
Rebounding
6.5
P87
True shooting
50%
P61
Two-way impact
+2.5
P64
Stops
59%
P74
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
35
PTS
8.8 / game
15–35
FGM–FGA
5–18
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
4.3 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
1.55×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
26
REB
6.5 / game
6
OREB
20
DREB
6.5
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
66.3
HESI
64.5
PI
95.3
ORtg
92.8
DRtg
+2.5
NRtg
-0.9
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
11%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
+1.3
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#64
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
8.8
PPG
6.5
RPG
4.3
APG
1.3
SPG
1.0
BPG
28%
3P%
50%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #64
//quick_read
8.8
PPG
6.5
RPG
4.3
APG
2.8
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.8
P71
Playmaking
4.3
P92
Rebounding
6.5
P87
True shooting
50%
P61
Two-way impact
+2.5
P64
Stops
59%
P74
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
35
PTS
8.8 / game
15–35
FGM–FGA
5–18
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
4.3 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
1.55×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
26
REB
6.5 / game
6
OREB
20
DREB
6.5
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
66.3
HESI
64.5
PI
95.3
ORtg
92.8
DRtg
+2.5
NRtg
-0.9
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
11%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
+1.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.