Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

George Aidan Green

Small Forward · PHI, CAN · b. 2008

//measurables

195 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

11.1 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile

57.1% TSScoring efficiency · 78th event percentile

66.8
HESI v2.1: #63
of 188: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #63 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

66.8

Event performance

67th event percentile

65.0

Prospect index

67th event percentile

ORtg

104.6

Points / 100 poss.

67th event percentile

DRtg

102.1

Lower is better

48th event percentile

NRtg

+2.5

Two-way margin

64th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 104.6 · 67th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 102.1 · Stop% 54.1% · Team DRtg 102.3

Sample context

7 games · 137 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

11.1 PPG84th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

57.1% TS78th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

66.8

67th event percentile

Prospect index

65.0

67th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

104.6

67th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

102.1

48th event percentile

Two-way margin

+2.5

64th event percentile

Stop percentage

54.1%

61st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.1 PPG

84th event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

76th event percentile

Rebounding

3.4 RPG

60th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.6 stocks

69th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

57.1% TS

78th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.6 ORtg and 102.1 DRtg, producing a +2.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and creation.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
11.1 PPG
84th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
57.1% TS
78th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Creation
2.0 APG
76th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

104.6

67th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.1 PPG

84th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

57.1%

78th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

53.3%

75th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

50.0%

83rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

40.0%

context

1.4 attempts per game

Free throws

73.7%

61st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

49.3%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

76th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

102.1

48th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

102.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.2

64th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.1%

61st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.6 STL+BLK

69th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

31.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+2.5

64th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-0.7

67th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

66.8

67th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

65.0

67th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.9%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.4 RPG

60th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

136.6

context

19.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#63

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

592.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

11.1

PPG

3.4

RPG

2.0

APG

#63

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#63/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.1

PPG

3.4

RPG

2.0

APG

2.1

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

57%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.1

P84

Playmaking

2.0

P76

Rebounding

3.4

P60

True shooting

57%

P78

Two-way impact

+2.5

P64

Stops

54%

P61

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

50%

30 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

40%

4 made / 10 attempts

Free throws

74%

14 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

17% of attempts from three

●2PA 50●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

11.1 / game

30–60

FGM–FGA

4–10

3PM–3PA

14–19

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.0 / game

TOV

2.1 / game

0.93×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.4 / game

OREB

DREB

3.4

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

66.8

HESI

65.0

104.6

ORtg

102.1

DRtg

+2.5

NRtg

-0.7

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

49%

Floor%

53%

eFG%

PIE

102.3

Team DRtg

+0.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #62Youssef Walid Sayed AbdelkaderC · EGY, QAT

//current_rank

#63

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #64YEHIA KASSASPF · SYR

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

11.1

PPG

3.4

RPG

2.0

APG

1.3

SPG

0.3

BPG

40%

3P%

57%

TS%

event_stats