ORtg
94.6
53rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Johnny Sawma
Shooting Guard · LBN · b. 2009
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer20.0 PPG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
20.0 PPGScoring load · 98th event percentile
2.7 stocksDefensive activity · 83rd event percentile
- 38.5
- HESI v2.1
- #116
- of 188
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #116 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
38.5
Event performance
39th event percentile
PI
42.3
Prospect index
39th event percentile
ORtg
94.6
Points / 100 poss.
53rd event percentile
DRtg
110.4
Lower is better
26th event percentile
NRtg
-15.8
Two-way margin
43rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 94.6 · 53rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 110.4 · Stop% 45.7% · Team DRtg 108.3
Sample context
3 games · 113 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
20.0 PPG98th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 stocks83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
38.5
39th event percentile
Prospect index
42.3
39th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
94.6
53rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
110.4
26th event percentile
Two-way margin
-15.8
43rd event percentile
Stop percentage
45.7%
36th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
20.0 PPG
98th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
35th event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
55th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 stocks
83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.2% TS
48th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Scorer
20.0 PPG · 98th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 39th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.6 ORtg and 110.4 DRtg, producing a -15.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Scoring load
20.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 83rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 26th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
110.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 35th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 36th event percentile
Defensive stops
45.7% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
20.0 PPG
98th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.2%
48th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
41.2%
43rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.6%
48th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
17.6%
context5.7 attempts per game
Free throws
72.2%
59th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.2%
61st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
35th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
110.4
26th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
108.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.1
50th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
45.7%
36th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.7 STL+BLK
83rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-15.8
43rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-13.1
39th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
38.5
39th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
42.3
39th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.9%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
55th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
112.6
context37.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#116
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
239.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
3
GP
20.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#116
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#116/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
20.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
20.0
P98
Playmaking
0.7
P35
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
46%
P48
Two-way impact
-15.8
P43
Stops
46%
P36
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
22 made / 57 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
3 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
60
PTS
20.0 / game
22–57
FGM–FGA
3–17
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.7 / game
3
TOV
1.0 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
9
REB
3.0 / game
3
OREB
6
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.5
HESI
42.3
PI
94.6
ORtg
110.4
DRtg
-15.8
NRtg
-13.1
Stable NRtg
46%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
8%
PIE
108.3
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #115Ameer SarminiPF · SYRrank_below · #117Andrew Xavier ChioSG · PHI
//current_rank
#116
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#114
#115
#117
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
20.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.7
APG
2.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
18%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #116
//quick_read
The line at a glance
20.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
20.0
P98
Playmaking
0.7
P35
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
46%
P48
Two-way impact
-15.8
P43
Stops
46%
P36
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
22 made / 57 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
3 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
60
PTS
20.0 / game
22–57
FGM–FGA
3–17
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.7 / game
3
TOV
1.0 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
9
REB
3.0 / game
3
OREB
6
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.5
HESI
42.3
PI
94.6
ORtg
110.4
DRtg
-15.8
NRtg
-13.1
Stable NRtg
46%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
8%
PIE
108.3
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.