Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Andrew Xavier Chio

Shooting Guard · PHI · b. 2008

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.3 APGCreation · 55th event percentile

0.9 stocksDefensive activity · 53rd event percentile

38.0
HESI v2.1: #117
of 188: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #117 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

38.0

Event performance

38th event percentile

41.9

Prospect index

38th event percentile

ORtg

92.7

Points / 100 poss.

50th event percentile

DRtg

108.7

Lower is better

30th event percentile

NRtg

-16.0

Two-way margin

42nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 92.7 · 50th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 108.7 · Stop% 39.0% · Team DRtg 102.3

Sample context

7 games · 123 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.3 APG55th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks53rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

38.0

38th event percentile

Prospect index

41.9

38th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

92.7

50th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

108.7

30th event percentile

Two-way margin

-16.0

42nd event percentile

Stop percentage

39.0%

20th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.0 PPG

44th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

55th event percentile

Rebounding

1.6 RPG

28th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.5% TS

42nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 92.7 ORtg and 108.7 DRtg, producing a -16.0 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
39.0% Stop%
20th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
1.6 RPG
28th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive efficiency
108.7 DRtg
30th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

92.7

50th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.0 PPG

44th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

43.5%

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

40.8%

41st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.9%

27th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

28.1%

context

4.6 attempts per game

Free throws

80.0%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

35.7%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

55th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

108.7

30th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

102.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.4

20th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

39.0%

20th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.9 STL+BLK

53rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

20.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-16.0

42nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-13.4

38th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

38.0

38th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

41.9

38th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.9%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.6 RPG

28th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

122.5

context

17.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#117

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

592.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

5.0

PPG

1.6

RPG

1.3

APG

#117

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#117/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.0

PPG

1.6

RPG

1.3

APG

1.0

TOV/G

1.3

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.0

P44

Playmaking

1.3

P55

Rebounding

1.6

P28

True shooting

44%

P42

Two-way impact

-16.0

P42

Stops

39%

P20

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

29%

11 made / 38 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

28%

9 made / 32 attempts

Free throws

80%

4 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

84% of attempts from three

●2PA 6●3PA 32

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.0 / game

11–38

FGM–FGA

9–32

3PM–3PA

4–5

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

1.29×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.6 / game

OREB

DREB

1.6

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

38.0

HESI

41.9

92.7

ORtg

108.7

DRtg

-16.0

NRtg

-13.4

Stable NRtg

39%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

41%

eFG%

PIE

102.3

Team DRtg

-6.4

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #116Johnny SawmaSG · LBN

//current_rank

#117

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #118Lino Jr. TubongbanuaSF · PHI

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.0

PPG

1.6

RPG

1.3

APG

0.6

SPG

0.3

BPG

28%

3P%

44%

TS%

event_stats