ORtg
91.3
48th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Lino Jr. Tubongbanua
Small Forward · PHI · b. 2009
//measurables
186 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.1 APGCreation · 78th event percentile
8.0 PPGScoring load · 65th event percentile
- 37.4
- HESI v2.1
- #118
- of 188
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #118 of 188 · Established
HESI
37.4
Event performance
38th event percentile
PI
41.4
Prospect index
38th event percentile
ORtg
91.3
Points / 100 poss.
48th event percentile
DRtg
106.9
Lower is better
32nd event percentile
NRtg
-15.7
Two-way margin
43rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 91.3 · 48th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 106.9 · Stop% 43.2% · Team DRtg 102.3
Sample context
7 games · 148 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.1 APG78th event percentile
Scoring load
8.0 PPG65th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
37.4
38th event percentile
Prospect index
41.4
38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
91.3
48th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
106.9
32nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-15.7
43rd event percentile
Stop percentage
43.2%
30th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.0 PPG
65th event percentile
Creation
2.1 APG
78th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
42nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
61st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.6% TS
59th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.3 ORtg and 106.9 DRtg, producing a -15.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 78th event percentile
Creation
2.1 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 30th event percentile
Defensive stops
43.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 32nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
106.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.0 PPG
65th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
49.6%
59th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
49.0%
65th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
44.2%
68th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.3%
context2.7 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
29th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.1%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.1 APG
78th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
106.9
32nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
102.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.6
31st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
43.2%
30th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
61st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-15.7
43rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-13.4
38th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
37.4
38th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
41.4
38th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.6%
58th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
42nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
147.9
context21.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#118
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
592.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
8.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.1
APG
#118
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#118/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.1
APG
2.1
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P65
Playmaking
2.1
P78
Rebounding
2.3
P42
True shooting
50%
P59
Two-way impact
-15.7
P43
Stops
43%
P30
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
23 made / 52 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
26%
5 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
●2PA 33●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
56
PTS
8.0 / game
23–52
FGM–FGA
5–19
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.1 / game
15
TOV
2.1 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
18
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.4
HESI
41.4
PI
91.3
ORtg
106.9
DRtg
-15.7
NRtg
-13.4
Stable NRtg
43%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
3%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
-4.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #117Andrew Xavier ChioSG · PHIrank_below · #119Tony KiwanF · LBN
//current_rank
#118
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#116
Shooting Guard · LBN
20.0 PPG 3.0 RPG 0.7 APG
//event_signalScorer20.0 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#117
#119
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
8.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.1
APG
0.9
SPG
0.3
BPG
26%
3P%
50%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #118
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.1
APG
2.1
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P65
Playmaking
2.1
P78
Rebounding
2.3
P42
True shooting
50%
P59
Two-way impact
-15.7
P43
Stops
43%
P30
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
23 made / 52 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
26%
5 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
●2PA 33●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
56
PTS
8.0 / game
23–52
FGM–FGA
5–19
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.1 / game
15
TOV
2.1 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
18
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.4
HESI
41.4
PI
91.3
ORtg
106.9
DRtg
-15.7
NRtg
-13.4
Stable NRtg
43%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
3%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
-4.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.