ORtg
114.5
78th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Antonio Browne
Forward · AUS · b. 2009
//measurables
193 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator5.7 APG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact92.5 HESI performance · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDefensive Impact75.3 DRtg · 67% Stop% · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+39.2 Net Rating · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
5.7 APGCreation · 95th event percentile
5.8 RPGRebounding · 83rd event percentile
- 92.5
- HESI v2.1
- #15
- of 188
- 67%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #15 of 188 · Established
HESI
92.5
Event performance
92nd event percentile
PI
85.5
Prospect index
92nd event percentile
ORtg
114.5
Points / 100 poss.
78th event percentile
DRtg
75.3
Lower is better
97th event percentile
NRtg
+39.2
Two-way margin
92nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 114.5 · 78th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 75.3 · Stop% 66.9% · Team DRtg 74.7
Sample context
6 games · 121 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
5.7 APG95th event percentile
Rebounding
5.8 RPG83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
92.5
92nd event percentile
Prospect index
85.5
92nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
114.5
78th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
75.3
97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+39.2
92nd event percentile
Stop percentage
66.9%
87th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.5 PPG
69th event percentile
Creation
5.7 APG
95th event percentile
Rebounding
5.8 RPG
83rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
51st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.1% TS
67th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Creator
5.7 APG · 95th event percentile
- P92
Event Impact
92.5 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile
- P92
Defensive Impact
75.3 DRtg · 67% Stop% · 92nd event percentile
- P87
Two-Way Impact
+39.2 Net Rating · 87th event percentile
Shooter
43% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 114.5 ORtg and 75.3 DRtg, producing a +39.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
75.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 95th event percentile
Creation
5.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 92nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+39.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.5 PPG
69th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.1%
67th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
53.7%
75th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
46.3%
77th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
42.9%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
38.9%
17th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
52.6%
79th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.7 APG
95th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
75.3
97th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
74.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.5
59th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
66.9%
87th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
51st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+39.2
92nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+23.6
92nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
92.5
92nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
85.5
92nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.7%
86th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.8 RPG
83rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
121.4
context20.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#15
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
509.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
5.7
APG
#15
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#15/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
5.7
APG
2.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.5
P69
Playmaking
5.7
P95
Rebounding
5.8
P83
True shooting
52%
P67
Two-way impact
+39.2
P92
Stops
67%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
46%
19 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
39%
7 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
●2PA 27●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
8.5 / game
19–41
FGM–FGA
6–14
3PM–3PA
7–18
FTM–FTA
creation
34
AST
5.7 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
2.62×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.8 / game
8
OREB
27
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
92.5
HESI
85.5
PI
114.5
ORtg
75.3
DRtg
+39.2
NRtg
+23.6
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
8%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-0.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#13
Shooting Guard · JPN
10.1 PPG 2.7 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalShooter48% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency68% TS on 10.1 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#14
Forward · AUS
7.6 PPG 3.0 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 4.6 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#16
Guard · KOR
18.8 PPG 3.5 RPG 6.8 APG
//event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 4.5 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer18.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
5.7
APG
1.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
43%
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #15
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.5
PPG
5.8
RPG
5.7
APG
2.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.5
P69
Playmaking
5.7
P95
Rebounding
5.8
P83
True shooting
52%
P67
Two-way impact
+39.2
P92
Stops
67%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
46%
19 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
39%
7 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
●2PA 27●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
8.5 / game
19–41
FGM–FGA
6–14
3PM–3PA
7–18
FTM–FTA
creation
34
AST
5.7 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
2.62×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.8 / game
8
OREB
27
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
92.5
HESI
85.5
PI
114.5
ORtg
75.3
DRtg
+39.2
NRtg
+23.6
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
8%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
-0.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.