Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Aru Takahashi

Shooting Guard · JPN · b. 2008

//measurables

187 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

67.7% TSScoring efficiency · 93rd event percentile

10.1 PPGScoring load · 77th event percentile

93.6
HESI v2.1: #13
of 188: 74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #13 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

93.6

Event performance

93rd event percentile

86.4

Prospect index

93rd event percentile

ORtg

139.1

Points / 100 poss.

95th event percentile

DRtg

100.0

Lower is better

57th event percentile

NRtg

+39.1

Two-way margin

91st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 139.1 · 95th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 100.0 · Stop% 40.6% · Team DRtg 93.1

Sample context

7 games · 171 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

67.7% TS93rd event percentile

Scoring load

10.1 PPG77th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

93.6

93rd event percentile

Prospect index

86.4

93rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

139.1

95th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

100.0

57th event percentile

Two-way margin

+39.1

91st event percentile

Stop percentage

40.6%

25th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

10.1 PPG

77th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

55th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

67.7% TS

93rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Offensive Impact
139.1 ORtg · 95th event percentile
P93
Event Efficiency
68% TS on 10.1 PPG · 93rd event percentile
P92
Event Impact
93.6 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile
Shooter
48% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 93rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 139.1 ORtg and 100.0 DRtg, producing a +39.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Offensive efficiency
139.1 ORtg
95th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Scoring efficiency
67.7% TS
93rd event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Two-way margin
+39.1 NRtg
91st event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
40.6% Stop%
25th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive activity
0.4 steals + blocks/G
31st event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

139.1

95th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

10.1 PPG

77th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

67.7%

93rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

66.7%

93rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

45.8%

75th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

47.6%

context

6.0 attempts per game

Free throws

70.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

52.0%

77th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

55th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

100.0

57th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

93.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.9

15th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

40.6%

25th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

31st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

26.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+39.1

91st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+26.9

93rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

93.6

93rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

86.4

93rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.8%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

171.3

context

24.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

74.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#13

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

531.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

10.1

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.3

APG

#13

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#13/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.1

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.3

APG

0.6

TOV/G

2.9

3PM/G

68%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.1

P77

Playmaking

1.3

P55

Rebounding

2.7

P51

True shooting

68%

P93

Two-way impact

+39.1

P91

Stops

41%

P25

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

46%

22 made / 48 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

48%

20 made / 42 attempts

Free throws

70%

7 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

88% of attempts from three

●2PA 6●3PA 42

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

10.1 / game

22–48

FGM–FGA

20–42

3PM–3PA

7–10

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

0.6 / game

2.25×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.7 / game

OREB

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

93.6

HESI

86.4

139.1

ORtg

100.0

DRtg

+39.1

NRtg

+26.9

Stable NRtg

41%

Stop%

52%

Floor%

67%

eFG%

PIE

93.1

Team DRtg

-6.9

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #12Junxian LiC · CHN

//current_rank

#13

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #14Josh McCannF · AUS

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

10.1

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.3

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

48%

3P%

68%

TS%

event_stats