back_to_rankings
Jai Fa'ale portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Jai Fa'ale

Forward · AUS · b. 2008

//measurables

195 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer17.5 PPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact94.7 HESI performance · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+43.3 Net Rating · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact122.9 ORtg · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

17.5 PPGScoring load · 95th event percentile

2.3 APGCreation · 81st event percentile

94.7
HESI v2.1
#11
of 188
69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #11 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

94.7

Event performance

94th event percentile

PI

87.2

Prospect index

94th event percentile

ORtg

122.9

Points / 100 poss.

87th event percentile

DRtg

79.5

Lower is better

95th event percentile

NRtg

+43.3

Two-way margin

93rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 122.9 · 87th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 79.5 · Stop% 57.7% · Team DRtg 74.7

Sample context

6 games · 135 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

17.5 PPG95th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG81st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

94.7

94th event percentile

Prospect index

87.2

94th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

122.9

87th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

79.5

95th event percentile

Two-way margin

+43.3

93rd event percentile

Stop percentage

57.7%

70th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

17.5 PPG

95th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

54.5% TS

72nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Scorer

    17.5 PPG · 95th event percentile

  • P94

    Event Impact

    94.7 HESI performance · 94th event percentile

  • P88

    Two-Way Impact

    +43.3 Net Rating · 88th event percentile

  • P87

    Offensive Impact

    122.9 ORtg · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 94th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 122.9 ORtg and 79.5 DRtg, producing a +43.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, scoring load, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    79.5 DRtg

    95th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Scoring load

    17.5 PPG

    95th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +43.3 NRtg

    93rd event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

122.9

87th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

17.5 PPG

95th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

54.5%

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

54.0%

76th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

44.3%

69th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

34.0%

context

8.3 attempts per game

Free throws

52.6%

36th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

53.3%

82nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

79.5

95th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

74.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.8

27th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

57.7%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

59th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

33.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+43.3

93rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+27.5

94th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

94.7

94th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

87.2

94th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.8%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

135.0

context

22.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#11

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

509.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

17.5

PPG

4.0

RPG

2.3

APG

#11

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#11/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

17.5

PPG

4.0

RPG

2.3

APG

1.5

TOV/G

2.8

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

17.5

P95

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

4.0

P66

True shooting

55%

P72

Two-way impact

+43.3

P93

Stops

58%

P70

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

39 made / 88 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

34%

17 made / 50 attempts

FT

Free throws

53%

10 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

2PA 383PA 50

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

105

PTS

17.5 / game

39–88

FGM–FGA

17–50

3PM–3PA

10–19

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

9

TOV

1.5 / game

1.56×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

24

REB

4.0 / game

5

OREB

19

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

4

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

94.7

HESI

87.2

PI

122.9

ORtg

79.5

DRtg

+43.3

NRtg

+27.5

Stable NRtg

58%

Stop%

53%

Floor%

54%

eFG%

9%

PIE

74.7

Team DRtg

-4.8

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games135 minutes22.5 min/game69% sample weightrank #11 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yizhaojie Zhang portrait#9

    Yizhaojie Zhang

    Forward · CHN

    14.3 PPG 5.0 RPG 2.7 APG

    //event_signalShooter55% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency74% TS on 14.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Cayman TSUNEOKA portrait#10

    Cayman TSUNEOKA

    Power Forward · JPN

    11.3 PPG 8.8 RPG 1.8 APG

    //event_signalEvent Efficiency65% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Junxian Li portrait#12

    Junxian Li

    Center · CHN

    9.5 PPG 6.0 RPG 0.7 APG

    //event_signalRim Protection2.3 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

17.5

PPG

4.0

RPG

2.3

APG

1.0

SPG

0.2

BPG

34%

3P%

55%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #11

//quick_read

The line at a glance

17.5

PPG

4.0

RPG

2.3

APG

1.5

TOV/G

2.8

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

17.5

P95

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

4.0

P66

True shooting

55%

P72

Two-way impact

+43.3

P93

Stops

58%

P70

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

39 made / 88 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

34%

17 made / 50 attempts

FT

Free throws

53%

10 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

2PA 383PA 50

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

105

PTS

17.5 / game

39–88

FGM–FGA

17–50

3PM–3PA

10–19

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

9

TOV

1.5 / game

1.56×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

24

REB

4.0 / game

5

OREB

19

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

4

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

94.7

HESI

87.2

PI

122.9

ORtg

79.5

DRtg

+43.3

NRtg

+27.5

Stable NRtg

58%

Stop%

53%

Floor%

54%

eFG%

9%

PIE

74.7

Team DRtg

-4.8

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games135 minutes22.5 min/game69% sample weightrank #11 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.