ORtg
129.9
91st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Junxian Li
Center · CHN · b. 2008
//measurables
210 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection2.3 BPG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency68% TS on 9.5 PPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact94.1 HESI performance · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+46.6 Net Rating · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
68.3% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile
6.0 RPGRebounding · 84th event percentile
- 94.1
- HESI v2.1
- #12
- of 188
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #12 of 188 · Established
HESI
94.1
Event performance
94th event percentile
PI
86.8
Prospect index
94th event percentile
ORtg
129.9
Points / 100 poss.
91st event percentile
DRtg
83.2
Lower is better
91st event percentile
NRtg
+46.6
Two-way margin
94th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 129.9 · 91st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 83.2 · Stop% 71.2% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 109 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
68.3% TS95th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG84th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
94.1
94th event percentile
Prospect index
86.8
94th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
129.9
91st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.2
91st event percentile
Two-way margin
+46.6
94th event percentile
Stop percentage
71.2%
92nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.5 PPG
74th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
35th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
84th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 stocks
64th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
68.3% TS
95th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Rim Protection
2.3 BPG · 98th event percentile
- P95
Event Efficiency
68% TS on 9.5 PPG · 95th event percentile
- P94
Event Impact
94.1 HESI performance · 94th event percentile
- P92
Two-Way Impact
+46.6 Net Rating · 92nd event percentile
- P91
Defensive Impact
83.2 DRtg · 71% Stop% · 91st event percentile
- P91
Offensive Impact
129.9 ORtg · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 94th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 129.9 ORtg and 83.2 DRtg, producing a +46.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is creation.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
68.3% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 94th event percentile
Two-way margin
+46.6 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive stops
71.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 35th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.5 PPG
74th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
68.3%
95th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
66.7%
93rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
66.7%
97th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
69.2%
52nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
64.2%
96th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
35th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
83.2
91st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.6
90th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
71.2%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.7 STL+BLK
64th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+46.6
94th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+27.3
94th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
94.1
94th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
86.8
94th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.3%
86th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.0 RPG
84th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
109.3
context18.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#12
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.5
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#12
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#12/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.5
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
68%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.5
P74
Playmaking
0.7
P35
Rebounding
6.0
P84
True shooting
68%
P95
Two-way impact
+46.6
P94
Stops
71%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
67%
24 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
69%
9 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 36●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
57
PTS
9.5 / game
24–36
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
9–13
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
36
REB
6.0 / game
8
OREB
28
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
14
BLK
2.3 / game
12
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
94.1
HESI
86.8
PI
129.9
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+46.6
NRtg
+27.3
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
64%
Floor%
67%
eFG%
8%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+5.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #11Jai Fa'aleF · AUSrank_below · #13Aru TakahashiSG · JPN
//current_rank
#12
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#10
Power Forward · JPN
11.3 PPG 8.8 RPG 1.8 APG
//event_signalEvent Efficiency65% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#11
#13
Shooting Guard · JPN
10.1 PPG 2.7 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalShooter48% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency68% TS on 10.1 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.5
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.3
SPG
2.3
BPG
—
3P%
68%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.5
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
68%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.5
P74
Playmaking
0.7
P35
Rebounding
6.0
P84
True shooting
68%
P95
Two-way impact
+46.6
P94
Stops
71%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
67%
24 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
69%
9 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 36●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
57
PTS
9.5 / game
24–36
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
9–13
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.7 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
36
REB
6.0 / game
8
OREB
28
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
14
BLK
2.3 / game
12
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
94.1
HESI
86.8
PI
129.9
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+46.6
NRtg
+27.3
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
64%
Floor%
67%
eFG%
8%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
+5.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.