ORtg
134.3
94th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · CHN · b. 2010
//measurables
203 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
73.6% TSScoring efficiency · 96th event percentile
14.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #9 of 188 · Established
HESI
95.7
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
88.1
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
134.3
Points / 100 poss.
94th event percentile
DRtg
89.3
Lower is better
83rd event percentile
NRtg
+45.0
Two-way margin
94th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 134.3 · 94th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.3 · Stop% 56.8% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 139 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
95.7
95th event percentile
Prospect index
88.1
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
134.3
94th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.3
83rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+45.0
94th event percentile
Stop percentage
56.8%
69th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
14.3 PPG
92nd event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
84th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
73.6% TS
96th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Efficiency
74% TS on 14.3 PPG · 96th event percentile
Event Impact
95.7 HESI performance · 95th event percentile
Offensive Impact
134.3 ORtg · 94th event percentile
Scorer
14.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+45.0 Net Rating · 88th event percentile
Shooter
55% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 134.3 ORtg and 89.3 DRtg, producing a +45.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Scoring efficiency
73.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
134.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+45.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
134.3
94th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
14.3 PPG
92nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
73.6%
96th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
73.1%
96th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
63.0%
94th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
55.0%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
70.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
59.2%
91st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.7 APG
84th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.3
83rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.5
60th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
56.8%
69th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
68th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
32.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+45.0
94th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+29.0
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
95.7
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.1
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.0%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
138.7
context23.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#9
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
14.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.7
APG
#9
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
14.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
74%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.3
P92
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
74%
P96
Two-way impact
+45.0
P94
Stops
57%
P69
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
63%
34 made / 54 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
55%
11 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
7 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
86
PTS
14.3 / game
34–54
FGM–FGA
11–20
3PM–3PA
7–10
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
1.78×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
7
OREB
23
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
12
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
95.7
HESI
88.1
PI
134.3
ORtg
89.3
DRtg
+45.0
NRtg
+29.0
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
59%
Floor%
73%
eFG%
11%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-0.5
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#9
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
14.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
55%
3P%
74%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
14.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.7
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
74%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.3
P92
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
74%
P96
Two-way impact
+45.0
P94
Stops
57%
P69
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
63%
34 made / 54 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
55%
11 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
7 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
86
PTS
14.3 / game
34–54
FGM–FGA
11–20
3PM–3PA
7–10
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
1.78×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
7
OREB
23
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
12
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
95.7
HESI
88.1
PI
134.3
ORtg
89.3
DRtg
+45.0
NRtg
+29.0
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
59%
Floor%
73%
eFG%
11%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-0.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.