back_to_rankings
Yizhaojie Zhang portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Yizhaojie Zhang

Forward · CHN · b. 2010

//measurables

203 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Efficiency74% TS on 14.3 PPG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact95.7 HESI performance · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact134.3 ORtg · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer14.3 PPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

73.6% TSScoring efficiency · 96th event percentile

14.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile

95.7
HESI v2.1
#9
of 188
70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #9 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

95.7

Event performance

95th event percentile

PI

88.1

Prospect index

95th event percentile

ORtg

134.3

Points / 100 poss.

94th event percentile

DRtg

89.3

Lower is better

83rd event percentile

NRtg

+45.0

Two-way margin

94th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 134.3 · 94th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 89.3 · Stop% 56.8% · Team DRtg 88.8

Sample context

6 games · 139 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

73.6% TS96th event percentile

Scoring load

14.3 PPG92nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

95.7

95th event percentile

Prospect index

88.1

95th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

134.3

94th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

89.3

83rd event percentile

Two-way margin

+45.0

94th event percentile

Stop percentage

56.8%

69th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

14.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG

84th event percentile

Rebounding

5.0 RPG

77th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

68th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

73.6% TS

96th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P96

    Event Efficiency

    74% TS on 14.3 PPG · 96th event percentile

  • P95

    Event Impact

    95.7 HESI performance · 95th event percentile

  • P94

    Offensive Impact

    134.3 ORtg · 94th event percentile

  • P92

    Scorer

    14.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P88

    Two-Way Impact

    +45.0 Net Rating · 88th event percentile

  • Shooter

    55% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 134.3 ORtg and 89.3 DRtg, producing a +45.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring efficiency

    73.6% TS

    96th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    134.3 ORtg

    94th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  3. Two-way margin

    +45.0 NRtg

    94th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

134.3

94th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

14.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

73.6%

96th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

73.1%

96th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

63.0%

94th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

55.0%

context

3.3 attempts per game

Free throws

70.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

59.2%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.7 APG

84th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

89.3

83rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.5

60th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

56.8%

69th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

68th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

32.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+45.0

94th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+29.0

95th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

95.7

95th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

88.1

95th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

11.0%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.0 RPG

77th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

138.7

context

23.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#9

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

491.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

14.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

2.7

APG

#9

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#9/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

14.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

2.7

APG

1.5

TOV/G

1.8

3PM/G

74%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

14.3

P92

Playmaking

2.7

P84

Rebounding

5.0

P77

True shooting

74%

P96

Two-way impact

+45.0

P94

Stops

57%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

63%

34 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

55%

11 made / 20 attempts

FT

Free throws

70%

7 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

37% of attempts from three

2PA 343PA 20

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

86

PTS

14.3 / game

34–54

FGM–FGA

11–20

3PM–3PA

7–10

FTM–FTA

creation

16

AST

2.7 / game

9

TOV

1.5 / game

1.78×

AST:TOV

11

FD

rebounding

30

REB

5.0 / game

7

OREB

23

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

12

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

95.7

HESI

88.1

PI

134.3

ORtg

89.3

DRtg

+45.0

NRtg

+29.0

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

59%

Floor%

73%

eFG%

11%

PIE

88.8

Team DRtg

-0.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games139 minutes23.1 min/game70% sample weightrank #9 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Bailey Hanson portrait#7

    Bailey Hanson

    Guard · AUS

    10.2 PPG 4.5 RPG 7.2 APG

    //event_signalCreator7.2 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yuchen Zhang portrait#8

    Yuchen Zhang

    Guard · CHN

    7.0 PPG 1.0 RPG 3.6 APG

    //event_signalShooter56% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Cayman TSUNEOKA portrait#10

    Cayman TSUNEOKA

    Power Forward · JPN

    11.3 PPG 8.8 RPG 1.8 APG

    //event_signalEvent Efficiency65% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

14.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

2.7

APG

1.0

SPG

0.3

BPG

55%

3P%

74%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #9

//quick_read

The line at a glance

14.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

2.7

APG

1.5

TOV/G

1.8

3PM/G

74%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

14.3

P92

Playmaking

2.7

P84

Rebounding

5.0

P77

True shooting

74%

P96

Two-way impact

+45.0

P94

Stops

57%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

63%

34 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

55%

11 made / 20 attempts

FT

Free throws

70%

7 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

37% of attempts from three

2PA 343PA 20

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

86

PTS

14.3 / game

34–54

FGM–FGA

11–20

3PM–3PA

7–10

FTM–FTA

creation

16

AST

2.7 / game

9

TOV

1.5 / game

1.78×

AST:TOV

11

FD

rebounding

30

REB

5.0 / game

7

OREB

23

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

12

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

95.7

HESI

88.1

PI

134.3

ORtg

89.3

DRtg

+45.0

NRtg

+29.0

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

59%

Floor%

73%

eFG%

11%

PIE

88.8

Team DRtg

-0.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games139 minutes23.1 min/game70% sample weightrank #9 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.