ORtg
155.0
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Yuchen Zhang
Combo Guard · CHN · b. 2010
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact155.0 ORtg · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact96.3 HESI performance · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalCreator3.6 APG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter56% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
80.4% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile
3.6 APGCreation · 90th event percentile
- 96.3
- HESI v2.1
- #8
- of 188
- 55%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #8 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
96.3
Event performance
96th event percentile
PI
88.5
Prospect index
96th event percentile
ORtg
155.0
Points / 100 poss.
99th event percentile
DRtg
95.4
Lower is better
70th event percentile
NRtg
+59.7
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 155.0 · 99th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 95.4 · Stop% 42.5% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
5 games · 75 minutes · 55% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
80.4% TS99th event percentile
Creation
3.6 APG90th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentile
Prospect index
88.5
96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
155.0
99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
95.4
70th event percentile
Two-way margin
+59.7
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
42.5%
28th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
59th event percentile
Creation
3.6 APG
90th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
20th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
34th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
80.4% TS
99th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Offensive Impact
155.0 ORtg · 99th event percentile
- P97
Event Impact
96.3 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
- P90
Creator
3.6 APG · 90th event percentile
Shooter
56% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 96th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 155.0 ORtg and 95.4 DRtg, producing a +59.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
155.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
80.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+59.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 20th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 28th event percentile
Defensive stops
42.5% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 34th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.0 PPG
59th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
80.4%
99th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
77.5%
99th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
55.0%
88th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
56.3%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
60.2%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.6 APG
90th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
95.4
70th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.5
19th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
42.5%
28th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
34th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
13.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+59.7
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+29.5
96th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.5
96th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.7%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
20th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
74.7
context14.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
55.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#8
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
5
GP
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
3.6
APG
#8
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#8/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
3.6
APG
0.8
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
80%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P59
Playmaking
3.6
P90
Rebounding
1.0
P20
True shooting
80%
P99
Two-way impact
+59.7
P98
Stops
42%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
55%
11 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
56%
9 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
4 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
80% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
35
PTS
7.0 / game
11–20
FGM–FGA
9–16
3PM–3PA
4–4
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
3.6 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
4.50×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
2
OREB
3
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.3
HESI
88.5
PI
155.0
ORtg
95.4
DRtg
+59.7
NRtg
+29.5
Stable NRtg
42%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
78%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-6.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #7Bailey HansonG · AUSrank_below · #9Yizhaojie ZhangF · CHN
//current_rank
#8
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#6
#7
Guard · AUS
10.2 PPG 4.5 RPG 7.2 APG
//event_signalCreator7.2 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#9
Forward · CHN
14.3 PPG 5.0 RPG 2.7 APG
//event_signalShooter55% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency74% TS on 14.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
3.6
APG
0.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
56%
3P%
80%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
5 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
3.6
APG
0.8
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
80%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P59
Playmaking
3.6
P90
Rebounding
1.0
P20
True shooting
80%
P99
Two-way impact
+59.7
P98
Stops
42%
P28
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
55%
11 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
56%
9 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
4 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
80% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
35
PTS
7.0 / game
11–20
FGM–FGA
9–16
3PM–3PA
4–4
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
3.6 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
4.50×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
2
OREB
3
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.3
HESI
88.5
PI
155.0
ORtg
95.4
DRtg
+59.7
NRtg
+29.5
Stable NRtg
42%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
78%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-6.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.