ORtg
121.5
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · AUS · b. 2008
//measurables
191 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
7.2 APGCreation · 98th event percentile
2.2 stocksDefensive activity · 80th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #7 of 188 · Established
HESI
96.8
Event performance
97th event percentile
PI
88.9
Prospect index
97th event percentile
ORtg
121.5
Points / 100 poss.
84th event percentile
DRtg
73.6
Lower is better
98th event percentile
NRtg
+48.0
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 121.5 · 84th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.6 · Stop% 70.5% · Team DRtg 74.7
Sample context
6 games · 127 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
96.8
97th event percentile
Prospect index
88.9
97th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
121.5
84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.6
98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+48.0
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.5%
91st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.2 PPG
77th event percentile
Creation
7.2 APG
98th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
71st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.2 stocks
80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.9% TS
64th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
7.2 APG · 98th event percentile
Event Impact
96.8 HESI performance · 96th event percentile
Defensive Impact
73.6 DRtg · 71% Stop% · 94th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+48.0 Net Rating · 91st event percentile
Activity
4.5 RPG + 2.2 defensive plays/G · 77th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.5 ORtg and 73.6 DRtg, producing a +48.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Creation
7.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive efficiency
73.6 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+48.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
121.5
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.2 PPG
77th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.9%
64th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.8%
51st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
41.7%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
11.8%
context2.8 attempts per game
Free throws
70.4%
55th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
57.8%
89th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
7.2 APG
98th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.6
98th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
74.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.2
69th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.5%
91st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.2 STL+BLK
80th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+48.0
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+30.0
97th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.8
97th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.9
97th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.8%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
71st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
126.7
context21.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#7
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
509.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
7.2
APG
#7
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
10.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
7.2
APG
2.2
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.2
P77
Playmaking
7.2
P98
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
51%
P64
Two-way impact
+48.0
P95
Stops
71%
P91
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
20 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
12%
2 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
19 made / 27 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
61
PTS
10.2 / game
20–48
FGM–FGA
2–17
3PM–3PA
19–27
FTM–FTA
creation
43
AST
7.2 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
3.31×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
6
OREB
21
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
96.8
HESI
88.9
PI
121.5
ORtg
73.6
DRtg
+48.0
NRtg
+30.0
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
10%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
+1.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
7.2
APG
1.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
12%
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
10.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
7.2
APG
2.2
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.2
P77
Playmaking
7.2
P98
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
51%
P64
Two-way impact
+48.0
P95
Stops
71%
P91
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
20 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
12%
2 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
19 made / 27 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
61
PTS
10.2 / game
20–48
FGM–FGA
2–17
3PM–3PA
19–27
FTM–FTA
creation
43
AST
7.2 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
3.31×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
6
OREB
21
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
13
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
96.8
HESI
88.9
PI
121.5
ORtg
73.6
DRtg
+48.0
NRtg
+30.0
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
10%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
+1.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.