ORtg
127.1
90th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Curtis Evic
Forward · AUS · b. 2008
//measurables
205 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalDefensive Impact68.7 DRtg · 81% Stop% · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact97.9 HESI performance · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+58.4 Net Rating · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact127.1 ORtg · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.3 RPGRebounding · 86th event percentile
58.5% TSScoring efficiency · 81st event percentile
- 97.9
- HESI v2.1
- #5
- of 188
- 61%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #5 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
97.9
Event performance
98th event percentile
PI
89.8
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
127.1
Points / 100 poss.
90th event percentile
DRtg
68.7
Lower is better
99th event percentile
NRtg
+58.4
Two-way margin
97th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 127.1 · 90th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.7 · Stop% 81.0% · Team DRtg 74.7
Sample context
6 games · 92 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.3 RPG86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.5% TS81st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
97.9
98th event percentile
Prospect index
89.8
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
127.1
90th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.7
99th event percentile
Two-way margin
+58.4
97th event percentile
Stop percentage
81.0%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.2 PPG
52nd event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
76th event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
86th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.5% TS
81st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Defensive Impact
68.7 DRtg · 81% Stop% · 99th event percentile
- P97
Event Impact
97.9 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
- P95
Two-Way Impact
+58.4 Net Rating · 95th event percentile
- P90
Offensive Impact
127.1 ORtg · 90th event percentile
- P86
Rebounder
6.3 RPG · 86th event percentile
- P82
Activity
6.3 RPG + 2.0 defensive plays/G · 82nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 127.1 ORtg and 68.7 DRtg, producing a +58.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 99th event percentile
Defensive stops
81.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+58.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.2 PPG
52nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.5%
81st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
56.9%
80th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
55.2%
88th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context0.5 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
48th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
61.0%
94th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
76th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.7
99th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
74.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.1
91st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
81.0%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
80th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+58.4
97th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+32.3
98th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
97.9
98th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
89.8
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.3 RPG
86th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
92.4
context15.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#5
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
509.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.2
PPG
6.3
RPG
2.0
APG
#5
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#5/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.2
PPG
6.3
RPG
2.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.2
P52
Playmaking
2.0
P76
Rebounding
6.3
P86
True shooting
59%
P81
Two-way impact
+58.4
P97
Stops
81%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
55%
16 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
6.2 / game
16–29
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
38
REB
6.3 / game
13
OREB
25
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
6
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
97.9
HESI
89.8
PI
127.1
ORtg
68.7
DRtg
+58.4
NRtg
+32.3
Stable NRtg
81%
Stop%
61%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
7%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
+6.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#3
Forward · CHN
11.3 PPG 2.5 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 2.8 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency78% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
Guard · NZL
10.5 PPG 7.8 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#6
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.2
PPG
6.3
RPG
2.0
APG
1.3
SPG
0.7
BPG
33%
3P%
59%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.2
PPG
6.3
RPG
2.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.2
P52
Playmaking
2.0
P76
Rebounding
6.3
P86
True shooting
59%
P81
Two-way impact
+58.4
P97
Stops
81%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
55%
16 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
6.2 / game
16–29
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
38
REB
6.3 / game
13
OREB
25
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
6
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
97.9
HESI
89.8
PI
127.1
ORtg
68.7
DRtg
+58.4
NRtg
+32.3
Stable NRtg
81%
Stop%
61%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
7%
PIE
74.7
Team DRtg
+6.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.