back_to_rankings
Aubrey Chunga portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Aubrey Chunga

Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008

//measurables

196 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Impact98.4 HESI performance · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDefensive Impact78.1 DRtg · 76% Stop% · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.8 BPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+52.1 Net Rating · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

7.8 RPGRebounding · 93rd event percentile

3.5 stocksDefensive activity · 91st event percentile

98.4
HESI v2.1
#4
of 188
73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #4 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

98.4

Event performance

98th event percentile

PI

90.2

Prospect index

98th event percentile

ORtg

130.3

Points / 100 poss.

92nd event percentile

DRtg

78.1

Lower is better

96th event percentile

NRtg

+52.1

Two-way margin

96th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 130.3 · 92nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.1 · Stop% 76.1% · Team DRtg 84.8

Sample context

6 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

7.8 RPG93rd event percentile

Defensive activity

3.5 stocks91st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

98.4

98th event percentile

Prospect index

90.2

98th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

130.3

92nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.1

96th event percentile

Two-way margin

+52.1

96th event percentile

Stop percentage

76.1%

97th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

10.5 PPG

80th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Rebounding

7.8 RPG

93rd event percentile

Defensive activity

3.5 stocks

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.2% TS

86th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P97

    Event Impact

    98.4 HESI performance · 97th event percentile

  • P96

    Defensive Impact

    78.1 DRtg · 76% Stop% · 96th event percentile

  • P95

    Rim Protection

    1.8 BPG · 95th event percentile

  • P95

    Two-Way Impact

    +52.1 Net Rating · 95th event percentile

  • P93

    Rebounder

    7.8 RPG · 93rd event percentile

  • P92

    Offensive Impact

    130.3 ORtg · 92nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 130.3 ORtg and 78.1 DRtg, producing a +52.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    76.1% Stop%

    97th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    78.1 DRtg

    96th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +52.1 NRtg

    96th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

130.3

92nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

10.5 PPG

80th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

61.2%

86th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

62.5%

90th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

54.5%

87th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

36.8%

context

3.2 attempts per game

Free throws

47.1%

22nd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

60.4%

93rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

81st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.1

96th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+6.7

92nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

76.1%

97th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.5 STL+BLK

91st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

48.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+52.1

96th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+36.0

98th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

98.4

98th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

90.2

98th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

13.2%

97th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.8 RPG

93rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

163.8

context

27.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#4

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

466.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

10.5

PPG

7.8

RPG

2.3

APG

#4

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#4/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.5

PPG

7.8

RPG

2.3

APG

0.8

TOV/G

1.2

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.5

P80

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

7.8

P93

True shooting

61%

P86

Two-way impact

+52.1

P96

Stops

76%

P97

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

55%

24 made / 44 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

37%

7 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

47%

8 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

43% of attempts from three

2PA 253PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

63

PTS

10.5 / game

24–44

FGM–FGA

7–19

3PM–3PA

8–17

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

5

TOV

0.8 / game

2.80×

AST:TOV

12

FD

rebounding

47

REB

7.8 / game

11

OREB

36

DREB

7.8

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.7 / game

11

BLK

1.8 / game

7

PF

21

STL+BLK

3.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

98.4

HESI

90.2

PI

130.3

ORtg

78.1

DRtg

+52.1

NRtg

+36.0

Stable NRtg

76%

Stop%

60%

Floor%

63%

eFG%

13%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

+6.7

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games164 minutes27.3 min/game73% sample weightrank #4 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Philip Wickham portrait#2

    Philip Wickham

    Forward · NZL

    8.3 PPG 6.8 RPG 1.8 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yixuan Yang portrait#3

    Yixuan Yang

    Forward · CHN

    11.3 PPG 2.5 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 2.8 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency78% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Curtis Evic portrait#5

    Curtis Evic

    Forward · AUS

    6.2 PPG 6.3 RPG 2.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

10.5

PPG

7.8

RPG

2.3

APG

1.7

SPG

1.8

BPG

37%

3P%

61%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #4

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.5

PPG

7.8

RPG

2.3

APG

0.8

TOV/G

1.2

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.5

P80

Playmaking

2.3

P81

Rebounding

7.8

P93

True shooting

61%

P86

Two-way impact

+52.1

P96

Stops

76%

P97

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

55%

24 made / 44 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

37%

7 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

47%

8 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

43% of attempts from three

2PA 253PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

63

PTS

10.5 / game

24–44

FGM–FGA

7–19

3PM–3PA

8–17

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

5

TOV

0.8 / game

2.80×

AST:TOV

12

FD

rebounding

47

REB

7.8 / game

11

OREB

36

DREB

7.8

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.7 / game

11

BLK

1.8 / game

7

PF

21

STL+BLK

3.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

98.4

HESI

90.2

PI

130.3

ORtg

78.1

DRtg

+52.1

NRtg

+36.0

Stable NRtg

76%

Stop%

60%

Floor%

63%

eFG%

13%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

+6.7

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games164 minutes27.3 min/game73% sample weightrank #4 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.