ORtg
130.3
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
7.8 RPGRebounding · 93rd event percentile
3.5 stocksDefensive activity · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #4 of 188 · Established
HESI
98.4
Event performance
98th event percentile
PI
90.2
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
130.3
Points / 100 poss.
92nd event percentile
DRtg
78.1
Lower is better
96th event percentile
NRtg
+52.1
Two-way margin
96th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 130.3 · 92nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 78.1 · Stop% 76.1% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
98.4
98th event percentile
Prospect index
90.2
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
130.3
92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
78.1
96th event percentile
Two-way margin
+52.1
96th event percentile
Stop percentage
76.1%
97th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.5 PPG
80th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
81st event percentile
Rebounding
7.8 RPG
93rd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.5 stocks
91st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
61.2% TS
86th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
98.4 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
Defensive Impact
78.1 DRtg · 76% Stop% · 96th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.8 BPG · 95th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+52.1 Net Rating · 95th event percentile
Rebounder
7.8 RPG · 93rd event percentile
Offensive Impact
130.3 ORtg · 92nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 130.3 ORtg and 78.1 DRtg, producing a +52.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Defensive stops
76.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
78.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+52.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
130.3
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.5 PPG
80th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
61.2%
86th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
62.5%
90th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
54.5%
87th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
36.8%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
47.1%
22nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
60.4%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
81st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
78.1
96th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.7
92nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.1%
97th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.5 STL+BLK
91st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
48.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+52.1
96th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+36.0
98th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
98.4
98th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.2
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.2%
97th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.8 RPG
93rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
163.8
context27.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#4
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.5
PPG
7.8
RPG
2.3
APG
#4
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
10.5
PPG
7.8
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.5
P80
Playmaking
2.3
P81
Rebounding
7.8
P93
True shooting
61%
P86
Two-way impact
+52.1
P96
Stops
76%
P97
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
55%
24 made / 44 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
8 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
63
PTS
10.5 / game
24–44
FGM–FGA
7–19
3PM–3PA
8–17
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.80×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
47
REB
7.8 / game
11
OREB
36
DREB
7.8
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
11
BLK
1.8 / game
7
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
98.4
HESI
90.2
PI
130.3
ORtg
78.1
DRtg
+52.1
NRtg
+36.0
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
63%
eFG%
13%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+6.7
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.5
PPG
7.8
RPG
2.3
APG
1.7
SPG
1.8
BPG
37%
3P%
61%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
10.5
PPG
7.8
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.5
P80
Playmaking
2.3
P81
Rebounding
7.8
P93
True shooting
61%
P86
Two-way impact
+52.1
P96
Stops
76%
P97
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
55%
24 made / 44 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
8 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
63
PTS
10.5 / game
24–44
FGM–FGA
7–19
3PM–3PA
8–17
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
2.80×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
47
REB
7.8 / game
11
OREB
36
DREB
7.8
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
11
BLK
1.8 / game
7
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
98.4
HESI
90.2
PI
130.3
ORtg
78.1
DRtg
+52.1
NRtg
+36.0
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
63%
eFG%
13%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+6.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.