back_to_rankings
Philip Wickham portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Philip Wickham

Forward · NZL · b. 2008

//measurables

203 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Impact99.5 HESI performance · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact154.1 ORtg · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency75% TS on 8.3 PPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+72.4 Net Rating · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

74.6% TSScoring efficiency · 97th event percentile

6.8 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile

99.5
HESI v2.1
#2
of 188
65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #2 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

99.5

Event performance

99th event percentile

PI

91.1

Prospect index

99th event percentile

ORtg

154.1

Points / 100 poss.

99th event percentile

DRtg

81.7

Lower is better

92nd event percentile

NRtg

+72.4

Two-way margin

99th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 154.1 · 99th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 81.7 · Stop% 67.8% · Team DRtg 84.8

Sample context

6 games · 114 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

74.6% TS97th event percentile

Rebounding

6.8 RPG89th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

99.5

99th event percentile

Prospect index

91.1

99th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

154.1

99th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

81.7

92nd event percentile

Two-way margin

+72.4

99th event percentile

Stop percentage

67.8%

88th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.3 PPG

68th event percentile

Creation

1.8 APG

72nd event percentile

Rebounding

6.8 RPG

89th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

64th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

74.6% TS

97th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Event Impact

    99.5 HESI performance · 99th event percentile

  • P99

    Offensive Impact

    154.1 ORtg · 99th event percentile

  • P97

    Event Efficiency

    75% TS on 8.3 PPG · 97th event percentile

  • P96

    Two-Way Impact

    +72.4 Net Rating · 96th event percentile

  • P90

    Defensive Impact

    81.7 DRtg · 68% Stop% · 90th event percentile

  • P89

    Rebounder

    6.8 RPG · 89th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 154.1 ORtg and 81.7 DRtg, producing a +72.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Two-way margin

    +72.4 NRtg

    99th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    154.1 ORtg

    99th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    74.6% TS

    97th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

154.1

99th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.3 PPG

68th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

74.6%

97th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

73.3%

97th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

73.3%

99th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.5 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

66th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

75.4%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.8 APG

72nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

81.7

92nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.1

82nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

67.8%

88th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

64th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+72.4

99th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+44.6

99th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

99.5

99th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

91.1

99th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

10.4%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.8 RPG

89th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

113.7

context

18.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#2

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

466.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

8.3

PPG

6.8

RPG

1.8

APG

#2

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#2/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

6.8

RPG

1.8

APG

0.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

75%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P68

Playmaking

1.8

P72

Rebounding

6.8

P89

True shooting

75%

P97

Two-way impact

+72.4

P99

Stops

68%

P88

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

73%

22 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

6 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 273PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

8.3 / game

22–30

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

6–8

FTM–FTA

creation

11

AST

1.8 / game

3

TOV

0.5 / game

3.67×

AST:TOV

7

FD

rebounding

41

REB

6.8 / game

14

OREB

27

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.7 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

14

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

99.5

HESI

91.1

PI

154.1

ORtg

81.7

DRtg

+72.4

NRtg

+44.6

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

75%

Floor%

73%

eFG%

10%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

+3.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games114 minutes18.9 min/game65% sample weightrank #2 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yixuan Yang portrait#3

    Yixuan Yang

    Forward · CHN

    11.3 PPG 2.5 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 2.8 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency78% TS on 11.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Aubrey Chunga portrait#4

    Aubrey Chunga

    Guard · NZL

    10.5 PPG 7.8 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Curtis Evic portrait#5

    Curtis Evic

    Forward · AUS

    6.2 PPG 6.3 RPG 2.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

8.3

PPG

6.8

RPG

1.8

APG

0.7

SPG

0.5

BPG

0%

3P%

75%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #2

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

6.8

RPG

1.8

APG

0.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

75%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P68

Playmaking

1.8

P72

Rebounding

6.8

P89

True shooting

75%

P97

Two-way impact

+72.4

P99

Stops

68%

P88

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

73%

22 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

6 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 273PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

8.3 / game

22–30

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

6–8

FTM–FTA

creation

11

AST

1.8 / game

3

TOV

0.5 / game

3.67×

AST:TOV

7

FD

rebounding

41

REB

6.8 / game

14

OREB

27

DREB

6.8

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.7 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

14

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

99.5

HESI

91.1

PI

154.1

ORtg

81.7

DRtg

+72.4

NRtg

+44.6

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

75%

Floor%

73%

eFG%

10%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

+3.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games114 minutes18.9 min/game65% sample weightrank #2 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.