ORtg
108.1
73rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · TPE · b. 2008
//measurables
191 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
3.6 APGCreation · 89th event percentile
1.9 stocksDefensive activity · 73rd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #57 of 188 · Established
HESI
70.0
Event performance
70th event percentile
PI
67.5
Prospect index
70th event percentile
ORtg
108.1
Points / 100 poss.
73rd event percentile
DRtg
102.0
Lower is better
49th event percentile
NRtg
+6.1
Two-way margin
68th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 108.1 · 73rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 102.0 · Stop% 58.0% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 149 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
70.0
70th event percentile
Prospect index
67.5
70th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
108.1
73rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
102.0
49th event percentile
Two-way margin
+6.1
68th event percentile
Stop percentage
58.0%
71st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
9.1 PPG
73rd event percentile
Creation
3.6 APG
89th event percentile
Rebounding
4.4 RPG
70th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.9 stocks
73rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.0% TS
64th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
3.6 APG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 70th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 108.1 ORtg and 102.0 DRtg, producing a +6.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive activity, and offensive efficiency.
Creation
3.6 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive activity
1.9 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Offensive efficiency
108.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
108.1
73rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
9.1 PPG
73rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.0%
64th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.1%
59th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
32.1%
context4.0 attempts per game
Free throws
53.8%
39th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.8%
68th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.6 APG
89th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
102.0
49th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.2
83rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
58.0%
71st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.9 STL+BLK
73rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+6.1
68th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.0
70th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
70.0
70th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.5
70th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.1%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.4 RPG
70th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
149.4
context21.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#57
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
9.1
PPG
4.4
RPG
3.6
APG
#57
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
9.1
PPG
4.4
RPG
3.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.1
P73
Playmaking
3.6
P89
Rebounding
4.4
P70
True shooting
51%
P64
Two-way impact
+6.1
P68
Stops
58%
P71
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
24 made / 57 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
9 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
54%
7 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
64
PTS
9.1 / game
24–57
FGM–FGA
9–28
3PM–3PA
7–13
FTM–FTA
creation
25
AST
3.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
2.78×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
7
OREB
24
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
16
PF
13
STL+BLK
1.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
70.0
HESI
67.5
PI
108.1
ORtg
102.0
DRtg
+6.1
NRtg
+2.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
6%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+3.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
9.1
PPG
4.4
RPG
3.6
APG
1.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
32%
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #57
//quick_read
9.1
PPG
4.4
RPG
3.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
9.1
P73
Playmaking
3.6
P89
Rebounding
4.4
P70
True shooting
51%
P64
Two-way impact
+6.1
P68
Stops
58%
P71
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
24 made / 57 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
9 made / 28 attempts
FT
Free throws
54%
7 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
64
PTS
9.1 / game
24–57
FGM–FGA
9–28
3PM–3PA
7–13
FTM–FTA
creation
25
AST
3.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
2.78×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
7
OREB
24
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
16
PF
13
STL+BLK
1.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
70.0
HESI
67.5
PI
108.1
ORtg
102.0
DRtg
+6.1
NRtg
+2.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
6%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+3.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.