ORtg
94.2
53rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward · KOR · b. 2008
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
17.0 PPGScoring load · 95th event percentile
3.5 stocksDefensive activity · 90th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #58 of 188 · Established
HESI
69.5
Event performance
69th event percentile
PI
67.1
Prospect index
69th event percentile
ORtg
94.2
Points / 100 poss.
53rd event percentile
DRtg
89.5
Lower is better
81st event percentile
NRtg
+4.7
Two-way margin
66th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 94.2 · 53rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.5 · Stop% 73.5% · Team DRtg 97.6
Sample context
6 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
69.5
69th event percentile
Prospect index
67.1
69th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
94.2
53rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.5
81st event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.7
66th event percentile
Stop percentage
73.5%
93rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
17.0 PPG
95th event percentile
Creation
3.3 APG
87th event percentile
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
88th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.5 stocks
90th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.8% TS
66th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
17.0 PPG · 95th event percentile
Disruptor
3.5 steals + blocks per game · 90th event percentile
Activity
6.7 RPG + 3.5 defensive plays/G · 89th event percentile
Rebounder
6.7 RPG · 88th event percentile
Creator
3.3 APG · 87th event percentile
Defensive Impact
89.5 DRtg · 73% Stop% · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 69th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.2 ORtg and 89.5 DRtg, producing a +4.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive stops, and defensive activity.
Scoring load
17.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive stops
73.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive activity
3.5 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
94.2
53rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
17.0 PPG
95th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.8%
66th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
47.1%
62nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
41.4%
55th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
27.0%
context6.2 attempts per game
Free throws
76.9%
70th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.4%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.3 APG
87th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.5
81st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
97.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+8.1
94th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
73.5%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.5 STL+BLK
90th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
49.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.7
66th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+1.3
69th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
69.5
69th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.1
69th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.4%
89th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.7 RPG
88th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
163.9
context27.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#58
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
497.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
17.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.3
APG
#58
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
17.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.3
APG
3.5
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.0
P95
Playmaking
3.3
P87
Rebounding
6.7
P88
True shooting
52%
P66
Two-way impact
+4.7
P66
Stops
73%
P93
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
41%
36 made / 87 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
10 made / 37 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
20 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
102
PTS
17.0 / game
36–87
FGM–FGA
10–37
3PM–3PA
20–26
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
3.3 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.95×
AST:TOV
21
FD
rebounding
40
REB
6.7 / game
8
OREB
32
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
17
STL
2.8 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
69.5
HESI
67.1
PI
94.2
ORtg
89.5
DRtg
+4.7
NRtg
+1.3
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
8%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
+8.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#58
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
17.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.3
APG
2.8
SPG
0.7
BPG
27%
3P%
52%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #58
//quick_read
17.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.3
APG
3.5
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.0
P95
Playmaking
3.3
P87
Rebounding
6.7
P88
True shooting
52%
P66
Two-way impact
+4.7
P66
Stops
73%
P93
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
41%
36 made / 87 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
10 made / 37 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
20 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
43% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
102
PTS
17.0 / game
36–87
FGM–FGA
10–37
3PM–3PA
20–26
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
3.3 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.95×
AST:TOV
21
FD
rebounding
40
REB
6.7 / game
8
OREB
32
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
17
STL
2.8 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
69.5
HESI
67.1
PI
94.2
ORtg
89.5
DRtg
+4.7
NRtg
+1.3
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
8%
PIE
97.6
Team DRtg
+8.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.