back_to_rankings
Isamil Hassini portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Isamil Hassini

MAR · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.4 stocksDefensive activity · 57th event percentile

37.9% TSScoring efficiency · 55th event percentile

29.2
HESI v2.1
#98
of 138
54%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #98 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

29.2

Event performance

29th event percentile

PI

34.9

Prospect index

29th event percentile

ORtg

64.3

Points / 100 poss.

35th event percentile

DRtg

84.7

Lower is better

33rd event percentile

NRtg

-20.4

Two-way margin

32nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 64.3 · 35th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 84.7 · Stop% 55.3% · Team DRtg 83.1

Sample context

5 games · 70 minutes · 54% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

37.9% TS55th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

29.2

29th event percentile

Prospect index

34.9

29th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

64.3

35th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

84.7

33rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-20.4

32nd event percentile

Stop percentage

55.3%

38th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

43rd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

37.9% TS

55th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P87

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 29th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 64.3 ORtg and 84.7 DRtg, producing a -20.4 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.0 APG

    6th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Scoring load

    1.8 PPG

    23rd event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  3. Two-way margin

    -20.4 NRtg

    32nd event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

64.3

35th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.8 PPG

23rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

37.9%

55th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

36.4%

59th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.4%

71st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

50.0%

45th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.1%

42nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

84.7

33rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

83.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.6

48th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.3%

38th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.4 STL+BLK

57th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

16.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-20.4

32nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-13.4

29th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

29.2

29th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

34.9

29th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-0.6%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

43rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

69.9

context

14.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

53.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#98

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

412.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

#98

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Elimane Sene portrait#96

    Elimane Sene

    Shooting Guard · Senegal

    1.5 PPG 0.0 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

1.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

0.4

SPG

1.0

BPG

—

3P%

38%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #98

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

1.2

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P23

Playmaking

0.0

P6

Rebounding

3.2

P43

True shooting

38%

P55

Two-way impact

-20.4

P32

Stops

55%

P38

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

36%

4 made / 11 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 11●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.8 / game

4–11

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

0

AST

0.0 / game

6

TOV

1.2 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

16

REB

3.2 / game

8

OREB

8

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

5

BLK

1.0 / game

14

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

29.2

HESI

34.9

PI

64.3

ORtg

84.7

DRtg

-20.4

NRtg

-13.4

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

83.1

Team DRtg

-1.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games70 minutes14.0 min/game54% sample weightrank #98 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.