ORtg
127.8
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Shooting Guard · CIV · b. 2010
//measurables
192 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-17
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #1 of 138 · Established
HESI
100.0
Event performance
99th event percentile
PI
93.9
Prospect index
99th event percentile
ORtg
127.8
Points / 100 poss.
99th event percentile
DRtg
68.6
Lower is better
76th event percentile
NRtg
+59.3
Two-way margin
99th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 127.8 · 99th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.6 · Stop% 68.9% · Team DRtg 68.8
Sample context
6 games · 144 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentile
Prospect index
93.9
99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
127.8
99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.6
76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+59.3
99th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.9%
75th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
17.5 PPG
98th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
63rd event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
55th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.0% TS
96th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
100.0 HESI performance · 100th event percentile
Offensive Impact
127.8 ORtg · 100th event percentile
Scorer
17.5 PPG · 98th event percentile
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 17.5 PPG · 96th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+59.3 Net Rating · 92nd event percentile
Top 3
#1 event rank
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 127.8 ORtg and 68.6 DRtg, producing a +59.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load.
Offensive efficiency
127.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+59.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Scoring load
17.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
127.8
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
17.5 PPG
98th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.0%
96th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.1%
82nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
84th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context6.0 attempts per game
Free throws
81.6%
92nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
58.2%
99th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
63rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.6
76th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
68.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.3
61st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.9%
75th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
55th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
41.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+59.3
99th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+40.2
99th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
93.9
99th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
16.5%
97th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
143.7
context23.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#1
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
502.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
17.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
#1
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
17.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.5
P98
Playmaking
1.3
P63
Rebounding
4.5
P63
True shooting
56%
P96
Two-way impact
+59.3
P100
Stops
69%
P75
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
33 made / 77 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
82%
31 made / 38 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
105
PTS
17.5 / game
33–77
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
31–38
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
4
TOV
0.7 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
12
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
100.0
HESI
93.9
PI
127.8
ORtg
68.6
DRtg
+59.3
NRtg
+40.2
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
17%
PIE
68.8
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//top_of_the_board
No one ranks above this player in the event.
//current_rank
#1
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
17.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
22%
3P%
56%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
17.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.5
P98
Playmaking
1.3
P63
Rebounding
4.5
P63
True shooting
56%
P96
Two-way impact
+59.3
P100
Stops
69%
P75
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
33 made / 77 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
82%
31 made / 38 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
105
PTS
17.5 / game
33–77
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
31–38
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
4
TOV
0.7 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
9
OREB
18
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
12
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
100.0
HESI
93.9
PI
127.8
ORtg
68.6
DRtg
+59.3
NRtg
+40.2
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
17%
PIE
68.8
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.