ORtg
99.7
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · SEN · b. 2008
//measurables
205 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-20
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #3 of 138 · Established
HESI
99.3
Event performance
99th event percentile
PI
90.9
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
99.7
Points / 100 poss.
92nd event percentile
DRtg
51.8
Lower is better
99th event percentile
NRtg
+47.9
Two-way margin
99th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 99.7 · 92nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 51.8 · Stop% 92.2% · Team DRtg 60.6
Sample context
6 games · 159 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
99.3
99th event percentile
Prospect index
90.9
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.7
92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
51.8
99th event percentile
Two-way margin
+47.9
99th event percentile
Stop percentage
92.2%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
11.3 PPG
87th event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
10.0 RPG
98th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.3 stocks
97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.3% TS
97th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Defensive Impact
51.8 DRtg · 92% Stop% · 99th event percentile
Event Impact
99.3 HESI performance · 99th event percentile
Rebounder
10.0 RPG · 98th event percentile
Activity
10.0 RPG + 4.3 defensive plays/G · 97th event percentile
Disruptor
4.3 steals + blocks per game · 97th event percentile
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 11.3 PPG · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.7 ORtg and 51.8 DRtg, producing a +47.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.
Defensive efficiency
51.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+47.9 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive stops
92.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
99.7
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
11.3 PPG
87th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.3%
97th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
55.4%
98th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
55.4%
98th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.2 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
65th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
50.3%
95th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
51.8
99th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
60.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+8.7
95th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
92.2%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.3 STL+BLK
97th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
57.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+47.9
99th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+33.3
99th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
99.3
99th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.9
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
30.3%
98th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
10.0 RPG
98th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
159.4
context26.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#3
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
470.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
11.3
PPG
10.0
RPG
1.5
APG
#3
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
11.3
PPG
10.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.3
P87
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
10.0
P98
True shooting
56%
P97
Two-way impact
+47.9
P99
Stops
92%
P99
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
55%
31 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
6 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
2% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
31–56
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
6–10
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
60
REB
10.0 / game
26
OREB
34
DREB
10.0
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.7 / game
10
BLK
1.7 / game
12
PF
26
STL+BLK
4.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
99.3
HESI
90.9
PI
99.7
ORtg
51.8
DRtg
+47.9
NRtg
+33.3
Stable NRtg
92%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
30%
PIE
60.6
Team DRtg
+8.7
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//current_rank
#3
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
11.3
PPG
10.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.7
SPG
1.7
BPG
0%
3P%
56%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #3
//quick_read
11.3
PPG
10.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.3
P87
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
10.0
P98
True shooting
56%
P97
Two-way impact
+47.9
P99
Stops
92%
P99
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
55%
31 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
6 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
2% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
68
PTS
11.3 / game
31–56
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
6–10
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
60
REB
10.0 / game
26
OREB
34
DREB
10.0
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.7 / game
10
BLK
1.7 / game
12
PF
26
STL+BLK
4.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
99.3
HESI
90.9
PI
99.7
ORtg
51.8
DRtg
+47.9
NRtg
+33.3
Stable NRtg
92%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
30%
PIE
60.6
Team DRtg
+8.7
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.