ORtg
115.0
98th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Irené Raphael Ouédraogo
CIV · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
208 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
49.7% TSScoring efficiency · 83rd event percentile
7.7 PPGScoring load · 72nd event percentile
- 97.8
- HESI v2.1
- #2
- of 138
- 64%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #2 of 138 · Established
HESI
97.8
Event performance
97th event percentile
PI
92.2
Prospect index
99th event percentile
ORtg
115.0
Points / 100 poss.
98th event percentile
DRtg
71.6
Lower is better
68th event percentile
NRtg
+43.4
Two-way margin
97th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 115.0 · 98th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 71.6 · Stop% 61.8% · Team DRtg 68.8
Sample context
6 games · 106 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
49.7% TS83rd event percentile
Scoring load
7.7 PPG72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
97.8
97th event percentile
Prospect index
92.2
99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
115.0
98th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
71.6
68th event percentile
Two-way margin
+43.4
97th event percentile
Stop percentage
61.8%
53rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
72nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.7% TS
83rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Offensive Impact
115.0 ORtg · 98th event percentile
- P97
Event Impact
97.8 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
Top 3
#2 event rank
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 115.0 ORtg and 71.6 DRtg, producing a +43.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
115.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+43.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.7 PPG
72nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
49.7%
83rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.8%
85th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
48.8%
92nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
58.3%
99th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
71.6
68th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
68.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.8
43rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.8%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+43.4
97th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+25.7
97th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
97.8
97th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
92.2
99th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.4%
88th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
105.7
context17.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
63.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#2
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
502.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-24 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-24
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Offensive rebounding, Low-defender rotations, Switching.
Now · ForwardNow · BigProjects · ForwardProjects · Big
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Low-defender rotations
- · Switching
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a post / mismatch option. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Offensive rebounding · Low-defender rotations
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive97.8 performance rating · rank 2 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 115.0 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive58.3% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive61.8% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#2
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#1
RANK
131
FIELD
100%
PERCENTILE
10.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#2/138Event board →
6
GP
7.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#1/131Event board →
6
GP
10.8
PPG
12.0
RPG
1.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #1Nathan DjakoSG · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #3Codé MbengueC · Senegal
//current_rank
#2
of 138 ranked
#4
#5
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.8
PPG
12.0
RPG
1.2
APG
3.2
SPG
2.5
BPG
0%
3P%
53%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #2
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.7
P72
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
4.0
P57
True shooting
50%
P83
Two-way impact
+43.4
P97
Stops
62%
P53
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
49%
20 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
6 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 41●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
46
PTS
7.7 / game
20–41
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
6–12
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
24
REB
4.0 / game
11
OREB
13
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
97.8
HESI
92.2
PI
115.0
ORtg
71.6
DRtg
+43.4
NRtg
+25.7
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
8%
PIE
68.8
Team DRtg
-2.8
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
12.0
RPG
1.2
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P84
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
12.0
P97
True shooting
53%
P93
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
57%
30 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
2% of attempts from three
●2PA 52●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
65
PTS
10.8 / game
30–53
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
5–18
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.70×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
72
REB
12.0 / game
31
OREB
41
DREB
12.0
REB/G
defense
19
STL
3.2 / game
15
BLK
2.5 / game
18
PF
34
STL+BLK
5.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.