ORtg
107.2
97th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Mouhamed Diamel Sanogo
Combo Guard · MLI · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
60.7% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile
4.7 RPGRebounding · 65th event percentile
- 97.1
- HESI v2.1
- #4
- of 138
- 56%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #4 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
97.1
Event performance
97th event percentile
PI
90.4
Prospect index
97th event percentile
ORtg
107.2
Points / 100 poss.
97th event percentile
DRtg
60.1
Lower is better
92nd event percentile
NRtg
+47.1
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 107.2 · 97th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 60.1 · Stop% 76.2% · Team DRtg 62.7
Sample context
6 games · 77 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS99th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG65th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
97.1
97th event percentile
Prospect index
90.4
97th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
107.2
97th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
60.1
92nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+47.1
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
76.2%
85th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
53rd event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
44th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
65th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
60th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS
99th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Event Impact
97.1 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
- P97
Offensive Impact
107.2 ORtg · 97th event percentile
- P94
Two-Way Impact
+47.1 Net Rating · 94th event percentile
- P88
Defensive Impact
60.1 DRtg · 76% Stop% · 88th event percentile
- P87
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.2 ORtg and 60.1 DRtg, producing a +47.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+47.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 97th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
107.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.5 PPG
53rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
60.7%
99th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
60.0%
99th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
60.0%
99th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.5 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
65th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
53.5%
97th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
44th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
60.1
92nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.5
78th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
76.2%
85th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
60th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+47.1
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+24.0
97th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
97.1
97th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.4
97th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.9%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
65th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
76.6
context12.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
56.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#4
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Senegal U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-25
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Low-defender rotations, Roll gravity, Short-roll processing.
Now · ForwardNow · BigProjects · ForwardProjects · Big
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Low-defender rotations
- · Roll gravity
- · Short-roll processing
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a post / mismatch option. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder.
Defensive assignments
primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 1; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Low-defender rotations · Roll gravity
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive97.1 performance rating · rank 4 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 107.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive53.5% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive76.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
5.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
0.8
APG
#4
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#4/138Event board →
6
GP
5.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #3Codé MbengueC · Senegalrank_below · #5Karl-Randell Kouame-ZezeSG · Côte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#4
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#2
Côte d'Ivoire
7.7 PPG 4.0 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
0.8
APG
0.5
SPG
1.0
BPG
0%
3P%
61%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
4.7
RPG
0.8
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P53
Playmaking
0.8
P44
Rebounding
4.7
P65
True shooting
61%
P99
Two-way impact
+47.1
P98
Stops
76%
P85
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
60%
15 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
3 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
5.5 / game
15–25
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
3–5
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
28
REB
4.7 / game
10
OREB
18
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
12
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
97.1
HESI
90.4
PI
107.2
ORtg
60.1
DRtg
+47.1
NRtg
+24.0
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
54%
Floor%
60%
eFG%
9%
PIE
62.7
Team DRtg
+2.5
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.