ORtg
121.6
85th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · PHI · b. 2008
//measurables
181 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
13.4 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile
61.8% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #32 of 188 · Established
HESI
83.4
Event performance
83rd event percentile
PI
78.2
Prospect index
83rd event percentile
ORtg
121.6
Points / 100 poss.
85th event percentile
DRtg
94.9
Lower is better
72nd event percentile
NRtg
+26.8
Two-way margin
83rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 121.6 · 85th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 94.9 · Stop% 70.5% · Team DRtg 102.3
Sample context
7 games · 127 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
83.4
83rd event percentile
Prospect index
78.2
83rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
121.6
85th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
94.9
72nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+26.8
83rd event percentile
Stop percentage
70.5%
91st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
13.4 PPG
91st event percentile
Creation
1.1 APG
50th event percentile
Rebounding
3.7 RPG
63rd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks
74th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
61.8% TS
87th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
13.4 PPG · 91st event percentile
Event Efficiency
62% TS on 13.4 PPG · 87th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+26.8 Net Rating · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 83rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.6 ORtg and 94.9 DRtg, producing a +26.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Defensive stops
70.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Scoring load
13.4 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
61.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
121.6
85th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
13.4 PPG
91st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
61.8%
87th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
62.1%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
59.7%
92nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
27.3%
context1.6 attempts per game
Free throws
53.1%
37th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
60.3%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.1 APG
50th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
94.9
72nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
102.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+7.5
93rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.5%
91st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.0 STL+BLK
74th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+26.8
83rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.6
83rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
83.4
83rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
78.2
83rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.7%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.7 RPG
63rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
126.6
context18.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#32
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
592.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
13.4
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.1
APG
#32
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
13.4
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.1
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
62%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
13.4
P91
Playmaking
1.1
P50
Rebounding
3.7
P63
True shooting
62%
P87
Two-way impact
+26.8
P83
Stops
71%
P91
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
60%
37 made / 62 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
3 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
17 made / 32 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
94
PTS
13.4 / game
37–62
FGM–FGA
3–11
3PM–3PA
17–32
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.1 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
25
FD
rebounding
26
REB
3.7 / game
16
OREB
10
DREB
3.7
REB/G
defense
20
STL
2.9 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
12
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
83.4
HESI
78.2
PI
121.6
ORtg
94.9
DRtg
+26.8
NRtg
+15.6
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
62%
eFG%
9%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
+7.5
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#32
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
13.4
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.1
APG
2.9
SPG
0.1
BPG
27%
3P%
62%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #32
//quick_read
13.4
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.1
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
62%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
13.4
P91
Playmaking
1.1
P50
Rebounding
3.7
P63
True shooting
62%
P87
Two-way impact
+26.8
P83
Stops
71%
P91
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
60%
37 made / 62 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
3 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
17 made / 32 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
94
PTS
13.4 / game
37–62
FGM–FGA
3–11
3PM–3PA
17–32
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.1 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
25
FD
rebounding
26
REB
3.7 / game
16
OREB
10
DREB
3.7
REB/G
defense
20
STL
2.9 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
12
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
83.4
HESI
78.2
PI
121.6
ORtg
94.9
DRtg
+26.8
NRtg
+15.6
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
60%
Floor%
62%
eFG%
9%
PIE
102.3
Team DRtg
+7.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.