back_to_rankings
Kenji Yob Moral portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Kenji Yob Moral

Point Guard · PHI · b. 2008

//measurables

181 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer13.4 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency62% TS on 13.4 PPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+26.8 Net Rating · 83rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

13.4 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile

61.8% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile

83.4
HESI v2.1
#32
of 188
68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #32 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

83.4

Event performance

83rd event percentile

PI

78.2

Prospect index

83rd event percentile

ORtg

121.6

Points / 100 poss.

85th event percentile

DRtg

94.9

Lower is better

72nd event percentile

NRtg

+26.8

Two-way margin

83rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 121.6 · 85th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 94.9 · Stop% 70.5% · Team DRtg 102.3

Sample context

7 games · 127 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

13.4 PPG91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.8% TS87th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

83.4

83rd event percentile

Prospect index

78.2

83rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

121.6

85th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

94.9

72nd event percentile

Two-way margin

+26.8

83rd event percentile

Stop percentage

70.5%

91st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

13.4 PPG

91st event percentile

Creation

1.1 APG

50th event percentile

Rebounding

3.7 RPG

63rd event percentile

Defensive activity

3.0 stocks

74th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.8% TS

87th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P91

    Scorer

    13.4 PPG · 91st event percentile

  • P87

    Event Efficiency

    62% TS on 13.4 PPG · 87th event percentile

  • P83

    Two-Way Impact

    +26.8 Net Rating · 83rd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 83rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.6 ORtg and 94.9 DRtg, producing a +26.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    70.5% Stop%

    91st event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Scoring load

    13.4 PPG

    91st event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    61.8% TS

    87th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

121.6

85th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

13.4 PPG

91st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

61.8%

87th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

62.1%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

59.7%

92nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

27.3%

context

1.6 attempts per game

Free throws

53.1%

37th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

60.3%

93rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.1 APG

50th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

94.9

72nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

102.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+7.5

93rd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

70.5%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.0 STL+BLK

74th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+26.8

83rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+15.6

83rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

83.4

83rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

78.2

83rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.7%

92nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.7 RPG

63rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

126.6

context

18.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#32

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

592.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

7

GP

13.4

PPG

3.7

RPG

1.1

APG

#32

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#32/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.4

PPG

3.7

RPG

1.1

APG

1.1

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

62%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.4

P91

Playmaking

1.1

P50

Rebounding

3.7

P63

True shooting

62%

P87

Two-way impact

+26.8

P83

Stops

71%

P91

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

60%

37 made / 62 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

3 made / 11 attempts

FT

Free throws

53%

17 made / 32 attempts

Shot selection

18% of attempts from three

2PA 513PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

94

PTS

13.4 / game

37–62

FGM–FGA

3–11

3PM–3PA

17–32

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

1.1 / game

8

TOV

1.1 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

25

FD

rebounding

26

REB

3.7 / game

16

OREB

10

DREB

3.7

REB/G

defense

20

STL

2.9 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

12

PF

21

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

83.4

HESI

78.2

PI

121.6

ORtg

94.9

DRtg

+26.8

NRtg

+15.6

Stable NRtg

71%

Stop%

60%

Floor%

62%

eFG%

9%

PIE

102.3

Team DRtg

+7.5

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games127 minutes18.1 min/game68% sample weightrank #32 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Keyu Yao portrait#30

    Keyu Yao

    Guard · CHN

    5.5 PPG 0.8 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalShooter42% 3PT on 2.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yu-Sheng Xing portrait#31

    Yu-Sheng Xing

    Guard · TPE

    13.1 PPG 4.3 RPG 2.4 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 4.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency60% TS on 13.1 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Kingston Kailahi-Aso portrait#33

    Kingston Kailahi-Aso

    Forward · NZL

    5.8 PPG 2.2 RPG 1.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

13.4

PPG

3.7

RPG

1.1

APG

2.9

SPG

0.1

BPG

27%

3P%

62%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #32

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.4

PPG

3.7

RPG

1.1

APG

1.1

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

62%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.4

P91

Playmaking

1.1

P50

Rebounding

3.7

P63

True shooting

62%

P87

Two-way impact

+26.8

P83

Stops

71%

P91

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

60%

37 made / 62 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

3 made / 11 attempts

FT

Free throws

53%

17 made / 32 attempts

Shot selection

18% of attempts from three

2PA 513PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

94

PTS

13.4 / game

37–62

FGM–FGA

3–11

3PM–3PA

17–32

FTM–FTA

creation

8

AST

1.1 / game

8

TOV

1.1 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

25

FD

rebounding

26

REB

3.7 / game

16

OREB

10

DREB

3.7

REB/G

defense

20

STL

2.9 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

12

PF

21

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

83.4

HESI

78.2

PI

121.6

ORtg

94.9

DRtg

+26.8

NRtg

+15.6

Stable NRtg

71%

Stop%

60%

Floor%

62%

eFG%

9%

PIE

102.3

Team DRtg

+7.5

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games127 minutes18.1 min/game68% sample weightrank #32 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.