ORtg
128.5
90th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · TPE · b. 2008
//measurables
172 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
13.1 PPGScoring load · 90th event percentile
2.4 stocksDefensive activity · 84th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #31 of 188 · Established
HESI
84.0
Event performance
84th event percentile
PI
78.7
Prospect index
84th event percentile
ORtg
128.5
Points / 100 poss.
90th event percentile
DRtg
103.7
Lower is better
42nd event percentile
NRtg
+24.8
Two-way margin
80th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 128.5 · 90th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.7 · Stop% 54.1% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 175 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
84.0
84th event percentile
Prospect index
78.7
84th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
128.5
90th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.7
42nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.8
80th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.1%
61st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
13.1 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
2.4 APG
82nd event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
68th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks
84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.0% TS
84th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Offensive Impact
128.5 ORtg · 90th event percentile
Scorer
13.1 PPG · 90th event percentile
Event Efficiency
60% TS on 13.1 PPG · 84th event percentile
Shooter
43% 3PT on 4.3 3PA/G
Activity
4.3 RPG + 2.4 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 84th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 128.5 ORtg and 103.7 DRtg, producing a +24.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring load, and defensive activity.
Offensive efficiency
128.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Scoring load
13.1 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive activity
2.4 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
128.5
90th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
13.1 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
60.0%
84th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
57.0%
81st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.9%
79th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
43.3%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
84.6%
82nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.1%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.4 APG
82nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.7
42nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.5
72nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.1%
61st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.4 STL+BLK
84th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
41.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.8
80th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+16.4
84th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
84.0
84th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
78.7
84th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.6%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
68th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
174.7
context25.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#31
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
13.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.4
APG
#31
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
13.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.4
APG
0.6
TOV/G
1.9
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
13.1
P90
Playmaking
2.4
P82
Rebounding
4.3
P68
True shooting
60%
P84
Two-way impact
+24.8
P80
Stops
54%
P61
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
34 made / 71 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
13 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
85%
11 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
42% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
92
PTS
13.1 / game
34–71
FGM–FGA
13–30
3PM–3PA
11–13
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
4.25×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
10
OREB
20
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
15
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
84.0
HESI
78.7
PI
128.5
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
+24.8
NRtg
+16.4
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
9%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#31
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
13.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.4
APG
2.0
SPG
0.4
BPG
43%
3P%
60%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #31
//quick_read
13.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.4
APG
0.6
TOV/G
1.9
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
13.1
P90
Playmaking
2.4
P82
Rebounding
4.3
P68
True shooting
60%
P84
Two-way impact
+24.8
P80
Stops
54%
P61
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
34 made / 71 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
13 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
85%
11 made / 13 attempts
Shot selection
42% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
92
PTS
13.1 / game
34–71
FGM–FGA
13–30
3PM–3PA
11–13
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
4.25×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
10
OREB
20
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
15
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
84.0
HESI
78.7
PI
128.5
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
+24.8
NRtg
+16.4
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
9%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.