back_to_rankings
Jihoo Eom portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Jihoo Eom

Forward · KOR · b. 2008

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator4.7 APG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact129.0 ORtg · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency66% TS on 12.8 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer12.8 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

4.7 APGCreation · 93rd event percentile

66.0% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile

85.0
HESI v2.1
#29
of 188
72%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #29 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

85.0

Event performance

85th event percentile

PI

79.5

Prospect index

85th event percentile

ORtg

129.0

Points / 100 poss.

91st event percentile

DRtg

102.6

Lower is better

47th event percentile

NRtg

+26.4

Two-way margin

83rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 129.0 · 91st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 102.6 · Stop% 43.0% · Team DRtg 97.6

Sample context

6 games · 152 minutes · 72% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.7 APG93rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

66.0% TS91st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

85.0

85th event percentile

Prospect index

79.5

85th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

129.0

91st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

102.6

47th event percentile

Two-way margin

+26.4

83rd event percentile

Stop percentage

43.0%

29th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.8 PPG

89th event percentile

Creation

4.7 APG

93rd event percentile

Rebounding

2.2 RPG

40th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

62nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

66.0% TS

91st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Creator

    4.7 APG · 93rd event percentile

  • P91

    Offensive Impact

    129.0 ORtg · 91st event percentile

  • P91

    Event Efficiency

    66% TS on 12.8 PPG · 91st event percentile

  • P89

    Scorer

    12.8 PPG · 89th event percentile

  • Shooter

    53% 3PT on 2.5 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 85th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 129.0 ORtg and 102.6 DRtg, producing a +26.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and rebounding.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.7 APG

    93rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    129.0 ORtg

    91st event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    66.0% TS

    91st event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    43.0% Stop%

    29th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  2. Rebounding

    2.2 RPG

    40th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

129.0

91st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.8 PPG

89th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

66.0%

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

62.0%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

54.0%

86th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

53.3%

context

2.5 attempts per game

Free throws

78.9%

72nd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

57.5%

88th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.7 APG

93rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

102.6

47th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

97.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.0

26th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

43.0%

29th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

62nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

27.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+26.4

83rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+16.7

85th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

85.0

85th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

79.5

85th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.5%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.2 RPG

40th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

152.1

context

25.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

71.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#29

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

497.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

12.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

4.7

APG

#29

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#29/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

4.7

APG

1.3

TOV/G

1.3

3PM/G

66%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.8

P89

Playmaking

4.7

P93

Rebounding

2.2

P40

True shooting

66%

P91

Two-way impact

+26.4

P83

Stops

43%

P29

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

54%

27 made / 50 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

53%

8 made / 15 attempts

FT

Free throws

79%

15 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

2PA 353PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

77

PTS

12.8 / game

27–50

FGM–FGA

8–15

3PM–3PA

15–19

FTM–FTA

creation

28

AST

4.7 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

3.50×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

13

REB

2.2 / game

5

OREB

8

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

12

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

85.0

HESI

79.5

PI

129.0

ORtg

102.6

DRtg

+26.4

NRtg

+16.7

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

58%

Floor%

62%

eFG%

9%

PIE

97.6

Team DRtg

-5.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games152 minutes25.3 min/game72% sample weightrank #29 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • MohammadYashar KamalKhaledi portrait#27

    MohammadYashar KamalKhaledi

    Shooting Guard · IRI

    16.7 PPG 2.9 RPG 2.3 APG

  • Feiyan Lyu portrait#28

    Feiyan Lyu

    Guard · CHN

    8.0 PPG 2.5 RPG 2.2 APG

  • Keyu Yao portrait#30

    Keyu Yao

    Guard · CHN

    5.5 PPG 0.8 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalShooter42% 3PT on 2.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

12.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

4.7

APG

1.2

SPG

0.2

BPG

53%

3P%

66%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #29

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

4.7

APG

1.3

TOV/G

1.3

3PM/G

66%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.8

P89

Playmaking

4.7

P93

Rebounding

2.2

P40

True shooting

66%

P91

Two-way impact

+26.4

P83

Stops

43%

P29

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

54%

27 made / 50 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

53%

8 made / 15 attempts

FT

Free throws

79%

15 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

2PA 353PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

77

PTS

12.8 / game

27–50

FGM–FGA

8–15

3PM–3PA

15–19

FTM–FTA

creation

28

AST

4.7 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

3.50×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

13

REB

2.2 / game

5

OREB

8

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.2 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

12

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

85.0

HESI

79.5

PI

129.0

ORtg

102.6

DRtg

+26.4

NRtg

+16.7

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

58%

Floor%

62%

eFG%

9%

PIE

97.6

Team DRtg

-5.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games152 minutes25.3 min/game72% sample weightrank #29 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.