ORtg
120.6
83rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Feiyan Lyu
Combo Guard · CHN · b. 2010
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Efficiency60% TS on 8.0 PPG · 83rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
59.6% TSScoring efficiency · 83rd event percentile
2.2 APGCreation · 79th event percentile
- 85.6
- HESI v2.1
- #28
- of 188
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #28 of 188 · Established
HESI
85.6
Event performance
85th event percentile
PI
80.0
Prospect index
85th event percentile
ORtg
120.6
Points / 100 poss.
83rd event percentile
DRtg
92.6
Lower is better
77th event percentile
NRtg
+28.1
Two-way margin
84th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 120.6 · 83rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 92.6 · Stop% 49.1% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 133 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
59.6% TS83rd event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG79th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
85.6
85th event percentile
Prospect index
80.0
85th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
120.6
83rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
92.6
77th event percentile
Two-way margin
+28.1
84th event percentile
Stop percentage
49.1%
49th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.0 PPG
65th event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
79th event percentile
Rebounding
2.5 RPG
47th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
59th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
59.6% TS
83rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P83
Event Efficiency
60% TS on 8.0 PPG · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 85th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 120.6 ORtg and 92.6 DRtg, producing a +28.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Two-way margin
+28.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
120.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
59.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.0 PPG
65th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
59.6%
83rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
53.2%
74th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
48.4%
80th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context1.5 attempts per game
Free throws
71.4%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
56.4%
86th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.2 APG
79th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
92.6
77th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.7
38th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
49.1%
49th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
59th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
26.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+28.1
84th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+16.8
85th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
85.6
85th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
80.0
85th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.3%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.5 RPG
47th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
132.5
context22.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#28
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.2
APG
#28
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#28/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.2
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P65
Playmaking
2.2
P79
Rebounding
2.5
P47
True shooting
60%
P83
Two-way impact
+28.1
P84
Stops
49%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
15 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
3 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
15 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
15–31
FGM–FGA
3–9
3PM–3PA
15–21
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
1.86×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
15
REB
2.5 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
2.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
16
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
85.6
HESI
80.0
PI
120.6
ORtg
92.6
DRtg
+28.1
NRtg
+16.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
53%
eFG%
4%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-3.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #27MohammadYashar KamalKhalediSG · IRIrank_below · #29Jihoo EomF · KOR
//current_rank
#28
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#26
Guard · NZL
20.8 PPG 3.5 RPG 4.0 APG
//event_signalScorer20.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#27
#29
Forward · KOR
12.8 PPG 2.2 RPG 4.7 APG
//event_signalShooter53% 3PT on 2.5 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency66% TS on 12.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.2
APG
1.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
33%
3P%
60%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #28
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.2
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P65
Playmaking
2.2
P79
Rebounding
2.5
P47
True shooting
60%
P83
Two-way impact
+28.1
P84
Stops
49%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
15 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
3 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
15 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
15–31
FGM–FGA
3–9
3PM–3PA
15–21
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
1.86×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
15
REB
2.5 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
2.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
16
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
85.6
HESI
80.0
PI
120.6
ORtg
92.6
DRtg
+28.1
NRtg
+16.8
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
53%
eFG%
4%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-3.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.