ORtg
112.7
75th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Jackson Ball
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 Asia Cup
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
20.8 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile
4.0 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
- 86.6
- HESI v2.1
- #26
- of 188
- 74%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #26 of 188 · Established
HESI
86.6
Event performance
86th event percentile
PI
80.8
Prospect index
86th event percentile
ORtg
112.7
Points / 100 poss.
75th event percentile
DRtg
86.5
Lower is better
88th event percentile
NRtg
+26.2
Two-way margin
82nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 112.7 · 75th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.5 · Stop% 56.7% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 169 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
20.8 PPG99th event percentile
Creation
4.0 APG91st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
86.6
86th event percentile
Prospect index
80.8
86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
112.7
75th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.5
88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+26.2
82nd event percentile
Stop percentage
56.7%
68th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
20.8 PPG
99th event percentile
Creation
4.0 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
3.5 RPG
61st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
78th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.2% TS
68th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Scorer
20.8 PPG · 99th event percentile
- P91
Creator
4.0 APG · 91st event percentile
- P78
Two-Way Impact
+26.2 Net Rating · 78th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 86th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 112.7 ORtg and 86.5 DRtg, producing a +26.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring load
20.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 91st event percentile
Creation
4.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 88th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
20.8 PPG
99th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.2%
68th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.1%
64th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
41.5%
56th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.9%
context9.0 attempts per game
Free throws
74.2%
62nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
50.6%
75th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.0 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.5
88th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.7
53rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
56.7%
68th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
78th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+26.2
82nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.2
86th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
86.6
86th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
80.8
86th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
10.6%
89th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.5 RPG
61st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
169.2
context28.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#26
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Clipvs VS JAPAN · 2026-09-22 · scout: Ahmed TareqClip · External link · approved scout evidence · opens externallyTape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-22
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
wing · off_guard · secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
wing · off_guard · secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Finishing, Advantage extension, Shooting utility, Closeout attack.
Now · WingNow · Off GuardProjects · WingProjects · Off Guard
Translatable strengths
- · Finishing
- · Advantage extension
- · Shooting utility
- · Closeout attack
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Can take on more spacing / shooting option responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 4.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary gap / nail helper (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). regular switch defender (grade 5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Fits as a secondary creator who attacks tilted floors and keeps the defense rotating. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Can take point-of-attack assignments in a coverage with clearly defined screen rules. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A low-spacing environment that removes driving and connective passing windows. A role with little movement, relocation or catch-ready shooting responsibility.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
HM D1
High-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive86.6 performance rating · rank 26 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 112.7 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive50.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive56.7% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
20.8
PPG
3.5
RPG
4.0
APG
#26
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#26/188Event board →
6
GP
20.8
PPG
3.5
RPG
4.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 · 188 ranked players
rank_above · #25SOHEYL SOLEYMAN NEZHADSF · IRIrank_below · #27MohammadYashar KamalKhalediSG · IRI
//current_rank
#26
of 188 ranked
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#24
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
20.8
PPG
3.5
RPG
4.0
APG
1.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
26%
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
The line at a glance
20.8
PPG
3.5
RPG
4.0
APG
2.5
TOV/G
2.3
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
20.8
P99
Playmaking
4.0
P91
Rebounding
3.5
P61
True shooting
52%
P68
Two-way impact
+26.2
P82
Stops
57%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
42%
44 made / 106 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
26%
14 made / 54 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
23 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
●2PA 52●3PA 54
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
125
PTS
20.8 / game
44–106
FGM–FGA
14–54
3PM–3PA
23–31
FTM–FTA
creation
24
AST
4.0 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
1.60×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.5 / game
7
OREB
14
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
18
PF
12
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
86.6
HESI
80.8
PI
112.7
ORtg
86.5
DRtg
+26.2
NRtg
+17.2
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
11%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-1.7
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.